[PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Fix mismerge of Littemill device in Cragganmore

The -next s3c64xx tree appears to have acquired a duplicate copy of
the commit adding Littlemill which is already in mainline causing two
copies of the device definition to be in the code. Either the duplicate
should be dropped or this commit should be applied on top of it to remove
one of the duplicates.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c |    5 -----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
index fe7f3be..d5a7982 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c

@@ -299,11 +299,6 @@ static struct platform_device littlemill_device = {
 	.id		= -1,
 };
 
-static struct platform_device littlemill_device = {
-	.name		= "littlemill",
-	.id		= -1,
-};
-
 static struct regulator_consumer_supply wallvdd_consumers[] = {
 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("SPKVDD", "1-001a"),
 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("SPKVDD1", "1-001a"),

-- 
1.7.9.rc1

Mark Brown wrote:

The -next s3c64xx tree appears to have acquired a duplicate copy of
the commit adding Littlemill which is already in mainline causing two
copies of the device definition to be in the code. Either the duplicate
should be dropped or this commit should be applied on top of it to remove
one of the duplicates.

Mark, maybe the duplication commit has been fixed now -next. I can't find it
now. So I think, we can drop this. If any other problems, please kindly let
me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:33:56AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:

Mark, maybe the duplication commit has been fixed now -next. I can't find it
now. So I think, we can drop this. If any other problems, please kindly let
me know.

Yes, it seems to have been sorted at some point.