Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

9 messages, 4 authors, 2012-01-26 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 16:23:28

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:00:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted hunk
Hi Russell,

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:29:30AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Russell King <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h            |   20 ++++-----------
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     |   38 +++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c |   38 +++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c |   38 +++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   |   38 +++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    |   38 +++++++++++++++---------------
 6 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
After applying this patch, I get compile-time errors in realview_*.c.
E.g.:

arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:158:1: error: ?AACI? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:159:1: error: ?MMCI0? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:160:1: error: ?KMI0? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:161:1: error: ?KMI1? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:162:1: error: ?PB1176_UART4? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:165:1: error: ?PB1176_SMC? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:166:1: error: ?SCTL? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:167:1: error: ?PB1176_WATCHDOG? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:168:1: error: ?PB1176_GPIO0? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:169:1: error: ?GPIO1? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:170:1: error: ?GPIO2? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:171:1: error: ?PB1176_RTC? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:172:1: error: ?SCI? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:173:1: error: ?PB1176_UART0? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:174:1: error: ?PB1176_UART1? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:175:1: error: ?PB1176_UART2? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:176:1: error: ?PB1176_UART3? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:177:1: error: ?PB1176_SSP? undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c:178:1: error: ?PB1176_CLCD? undeclared here (not in a function)
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h b/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h
index 735b57a..b1c6097 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h
@@ -28,21 +28,11 @@
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/leds.h>

-#define AMBA_DEVICE(name,busid,base,plat)                      \
-static struct amba_device name##_device = {                    \
-       .dev            = {                                     \
-               .coherent_dma_mask = ~0,                        \
-               .init_name = busid,                             \
-               .platform_data = plat,                          \
-       },                                                      \
-       .res            = {                                     \
-               .start  = REALVIEW_##base##_BASE,               \
-               .end    = (REALVIEW_##base##_BASE) + SZ_4K - 1, \
-               .flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,                       \
-       },                                                      
Which is because the old AMBA_DEVICE macro munges REALVIEW_ and _BASE
around the peripheral identifier...
quoted
+#define APB_DEVICE(name, busid, base, plat)                    \
+static AMBA_APB_DEVICE(name, busid, 0, base, base##_IRQ, plat)
+
+#define AHB_DEVICE(name, busid, base, plat)                    \
+static AMBA_AHB_DEVICE(name, busid, 0, base, base##_IRQ, plat)
...whereas the new macros just use base directly.

Fixing the macro solves the build problem:

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h b/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h
index b1c6097..f8f2c0a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/core.h
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@
 #include <asm/leds.h>
 
 #define APB_DEVICE(name, busid, base, plat)                    \
-static AMBA_APB_DEVICE(name, busid, 0, base, base##_IRQ, plat)
+static AMBA_APB_DEVICE(name, busid, 0, REALVIEW_##base##_BASE, base##_IRQ, plat)
 
 #define AHB_DEVICE(name, busid, base, plat)                    \
-static AMBA_AHB_DEVICE(name, busid, 0, base, base##_IRQ, plat)
+static AMBA_AHB_DEVICE(name, busid, 0, REALVIEW_##base##_BASE, base##_IRQ, plat)
 
 struct machine_desc;
 
but then I see a warning during boot:

[    1.669654] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    1.684021] WARNING: at drivers/amba/bus.c:514 amba_device_add+0x1b4/0x1d0()
[    1.705585] Modules linked in:
[    1.715195] [<c0013a00>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xfc) from [<c03d1350>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[    1.741288] [<c03d1350>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c001f9b8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74)
[    1.768689] [<c001f9b8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74) from [<c001f9fc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x2c/0x34)
[    1.798165] [<c001f9fc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x2c/0x34) from [<c023dcd4>] (amba_device_add+0x1b4/0x1d0)
[    1.826857] [<c023dcd4>] (amba_device_add+0x1b4/0x1d0) from [<c023dd84>] (amba_device_register+0x94/0xc4)
[    1.856106] [<c023dd84>] (amba_device_register+0x94/0xc4) from [<c0551934>] (realview_pb1176_init+0x74/0xac)
[    1.886120] [<c0551934>] (realview_pb1176_init+0x74/0xac) from [<c054d60c>] (customize_machine+0x24/0x30)
[    1.915340] [<c054d60c>] (customize_machine+0x24/0x30) from [<c000879c>] (do_one_initcall+0x48/0x1a0)
[    1.943505] [<c000879c>] (do_one_initcall+0x48/0x1a0) from [<c054b870>] (kernel_init+0x80/0x128)
[    1.970378] [<c054b870>] (kernel_init+0x80/0x128) from [<c000ea78>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
[    1.997192] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1e ]---

I suspect that comes from PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ being -1.
It seems you've also tested the code which detects -1 IRQs too, which
is good.  PB1176 needs that GPIO0_IRQ fixing, but I suspect passing
zero may not be entirely a good thing for it as request_irq(0,...)
probably succeeds there.  I think that needs fixing before this warning
can go away.

In the mean time, it's just a warning, and its saying there's something
wrong there which needs fixing but without anything currently broken.
So it's working as designed.

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 17:26:00

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:23:28PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:00:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
but then I see a warning during boot:

[    1.669654] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    1.684021] WARNING: at drivers/amba/bus.c:514 amba_device_add+0x1b4/0x1d0()
[    1.705585] Modules linked in:
[    1.715195] [<c0013a00>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xfc) from [<c03d1350>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[    1.741288] [<c03d1350>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c001f9b8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74)
[    1.768689] [<c001f9b8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74) from [<c001f9fc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x2c/0x34)
[    1.798165] [<c001f9fc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x2c/0x34) from [<c023dcd4>] (amba_device_add+0x1b4/0x1d0)
[    1.826857] [<c023dcd4>] (amba_device_add+0x1b4/0x1d0) from [<c023dd84>] (amba_device_register+0x94/0xc4)
[    1.856106] [<c023dd84>] (amba_device_register+0x94/0xc4) from [<c0551934>] (realview_pb1176_init+0x74/0xac)
[    1.886120] [<c0551934>] (realview_pb1176_init+0x74/0xac) from [<c054d60c>] (customize_machine+0x24/0x30)
[    1.915340] [<c054d60c>] (customize_machine+0x24/0x30) from [<c000879c>] (do_one_initcall+0x48/0x1a0)
[    1.943505] [<c000879c>] (do_one_initcall+0x48/0x1a0) from [<c054b870>] (kernel_init+0x80/0x128)
[    1.970378] [<c054b870>] (kernel_init+0x80/0x128) from [<c000ea78>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
[    1.997192] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1e ]---

I suspect that comes from PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ being -1.
It seems you've also tested the code which detects -1 IRQs too, which
is good.  PB1176 needs that GPIO0_IRQ fixing, but I suspect passing
zero may not be entirely a good thing for it as request_irq(0,...)
probably succeeds there.  I think that needs fixing before this warning
can go away.
Yup, I actually tested this simply by checking out your devel-3.3 branch, so
the whole series has been tested on the boards that I've mentioned.
In the mean time, it's just a warning, and its saying there's something
wrong there which needs fixing but without anything currently broken.
So it's working as designed.
Right. I took a quick look at the TRM for the PB1176, and I think we do have
an interrupt for GPIO0, it's just on the other GIC. This patch should do the
trick, but I'm not sure what I can do to tickle the GPIO stuff anyway:

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
index 5c3c625..708f841 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #define IRQ_DC1176_L2CC                (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 13)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_RTC         (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 14)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_CLCD                (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 15)     /* CLCD controller */
+#define IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 16)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_SSP         (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 17)     /* SSP port */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART0       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 18)     /* UART 0 on development chip */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART1       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 19)     /* UART 1 on development chip */
@@ -73,7 +74,6 @@
 #define IRQ_PB1176_DMAC                (IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 24)     /* DMA controller */
 #define IRQ_PB1176_RTC         (IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 25)     /* Real Time Clock */
 
-#define IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0       -1
 #define IRQ_PB1176_SCTL                -1
 
 #define NR_GIC_PB1176          2
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
index 1b6e60c..b1d7caf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static struct pl022_ssp_controller ssp0_plat_data = {
 #define PB1176_CLCD_IRQ        { IRQ_DC1176_CLCD }
 #define SCTL_IRQ       { }
 #define PB1176_WATCHDOG_IRQ    { IRQ_DC1176_WATCHDOG }
-#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ       { IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0 }
+#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ       { IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0 }
 #define GPIO1_IRQ      { IRQ_PB1176_GPIO1 }
 #define PB1176_RTC_IRQ { IRQ_DC1176_RTC }
 #define SCI_IRQ                { IRQ_PB1176_SCI }

Will

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 21:23:11

On 01/24/2012 06:26 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Right. I took a quick look at the TRM for the PB1176, and I think we do have
an interrupt for GPIO0, it's just on the other GIC. This patch should do the
trick, but I'm not sure what I can do to tickle the GPIO stuff anyway:
For a simple test just insert/remove the MMC card and see it
add/remove the card (appear in console, and /proc/interrupts)

Or do you mean tickle GPIO0? That is more tricky I think...

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 21:45:31

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:26:00PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted hunk
Right. I took a quick look at the TRM for the PB1176, and I think we do have
an interrupt for GPIO0, it's just on the other GIC. This patch should do the
trick, but I'm not sure what I can do to tickle the GPIO stuff anyway:

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
index 5c3c625..708f841 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #define IRQ_DC1176_L2CC                (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 13)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_RTC         (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 14)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_CLCD                (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 15)     /* CLCD controller */
+#define IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 16)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_SSP         (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 17)     /* SSP port */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART0       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 18)     /* UART 0 on development chip */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART1       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 19)     /* UART 1 on development chip */
@@ -73,7 +74,6 @@
 #define IRQ_PB1176_DMAC                (IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 24)     /* DMA controller */
 #define IRQ_PB1176_RTC         (IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 25)     /* Real Time Clock */
 
-#define IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0       -1
 #define IRQ_PB1176_SCTL                -1
 
 #define NR_GIC_PB1176          2
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
index 1b6e60c..b1d7caf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static struct pl022_ssp_controller ssp0_plat_data = {
 #define PB1176_CLCD_IRQ        { IRQ_DC1176_CLCD }
 #define SCTL_IRQ       { }
 #define PB1176_WATCHDOG_IRQ    { IRQ_DC1176_WATCHDOG }
-#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ       { IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0 }
+#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ       { IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0 }
 #define GPIO1_IRQ      { IRQ_PB1176_GPIO1 }
 #define PB1176_RTC_IRQ { IRQ_DC1176_RTC }
 #define SCI_IRQ                { IRQ_PB1176_SCI }
I guess we should believe the TRM on this - can you put this in the patch
system please?

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-25 09:58:00

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:45:31PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:26:00PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
index 5c3c625..708f841 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #define IRQ_DC1176_L2CC                (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 13)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_RTC         (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 14)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_CLCD                (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 15)     /* CLCD controller */
+#define IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 16)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_SSP         (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 17)     /* SSP port */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART0       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 18)     /* UART 0 on development chip */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART1       (IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 19)     /* UART 1 on development chip */
@@ -73,7 +74,6 @@
 #define IRQ_PB1176_DMAC                (IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 24)     /* DMA controller */
 #define IRQ_PB1176_RTC         (IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 25)     /* Real Time Clock */
 
-#define IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0       -1
 #define IRQ_PB1176_SCTL                -1
 
 #define NR_GIC_PB1176          2
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
index 1b6e60c..b1d7caf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static struct pl022_ssp_controller ssp0_plat_data = {
 #define PB1176_CLCD_IRQ        { IRQ_DC1176_CLCD }
 #define SCTL_IRQ       { }
 #define PB1176_WATCHDOG_IRQ    { IRQ_DC1176_WATCHDOG }
-#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ       { IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0 }
+#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ       { IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0 }
 #define GPIO1_IRQ      { IRQ_PB1176_GPIO1 }
 #define PB1176_RTC_IRQ { IRQ_DC1176_RTC }
 #define SCI_IRQ                { IRQ_PB1176_SCI }
I guess we should believe the TRM on this - can you put this in the patch
system please?
Sure. Which branch shall I take it against (before or after your amba
changes)?

Will

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-25 10:22:02

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:58:00AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
Sure. Which branch shall I take it against (before or after your amba
changes)?
If it's before them, we can think about putting it in as a fix during
this -rc independently of the rest of the changes.  If it's after,
then it'll probably add a conflict.

So, it'll be much easier to have it before, and I'll update what's
necessary in the amba branch.

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-25 10:39:06

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:22:02AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:58:00AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
Sure. Which branch shall I take it against (before or after your amba
changes)?
If it's before them, we can think about putting it in as a fix during
this -rc independently of the rest of the changes.  If it's after,
then it'll probably add a conflict.

So, it'll be much easier to have it before, and I'll update what's
necessary in the amba branch.
Okey doke, I've submitted it as 7300/1 against 3.3-rc1.

Will

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-25 11:06:47

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:39:06AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:22:02AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:58:00AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
Sure. Which branch shall I take it against (before or after your amba
changes)?
If it's before them, we can think about putting it in as a fix during
this -rc independently of the rest of the changes.  If it's after,
then it'll probably add a conflict.

So, it'll be much easier to have it before, and I'll update what's
necessary in the amba branch.
Okey doke, I've submitted it as 7300/1 against 3.3-rc1.
Right, so with the stack of amba patches on top, it looks like this,
which to me looks sane.  I haven't build-tested it though.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
index 5c3c625..708f841 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #define IRQ_DC1176_L2CC		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 13)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_RTC		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 14)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_CLCD		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 15)	/* CLCD controller */
+#define IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0	(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 16)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_SSP		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 17)	/* SSP port */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART0	(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 18)	/* UART 0 on development chip */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART1	(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 19)	/* UART 1 on development chip */
@@ -73,7 +74,6 @@
 #define IRQ_PB1176_DMAC		(IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 24)	/* DMA controller */
 #define IRQ_PB1176_RTC		(IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 25)	/* Real Time Clock */
 
-#define IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0	-1
 #define IRQ_PB1176_SCTL		-1
 
 #define NR_GIC_PB1176		2
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
index 1b6e60c..b1d7caf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static struct pl022_ssp_controller ssp0_plat_data = {
 #define PB1176_CLCD_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_CLCD }
 #define SCTL_IRQ	{ }
 #define PB1176_WATCHDOG_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_WATCHDOG }
-#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ	{ IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0 }
+#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0 }
 #define GPIO1_IRQ	{ IRQ_PB1176_GPIO1 }
 #define PB1176_RTC_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_RTC }
 #define SCI_IRQ		{ IRQ_PB1176_SCI }

Re: [PATCH 21/31] ARM: amba: realview: get rid of private platform amba_device initializer

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-26 17:25:27

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:06:47AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Right, so with the stack of amba patches on top, it looks like this,
which to me looks sane.  I haven't build-tested it though.
Will,

Did you see this?  Any comment?

Thanks.
quoted hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
index 5c3c625..708f841 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/irqs-pb1176.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #define IRQ_DC1176_L2CC		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 13)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_RTC		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 14)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_CLCD		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 15)	/* CLCD controller */
+#define IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0	(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 16)
 #define IRQ_DC1176_SSP		(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 17)	/* SSP port */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART0	(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 18)	/* UART 0 on development chip */
 #define IRQ_DC1176_UART1	(IRQ_DC1176_GIC_START + 19)	/* UART 1 on development chip */
@@ -73,7 +74,6 @@
 #define IRQ_PB1176_DMAC		(IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 24)	/* DMA controller */
 #define IRQ_PB1176_RTC		(IRQ_PB1176_GIC_START + 25)	/* Real Time Clock */
 
-#define IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0	-1
 #define IRQ_PB1176_SCTL		-1
 
 #define NR_GIC_PB1176		2
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
index 1b6e60c..b1d7caf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static struct pl022_ssp_controller ssp0_plat_data = {
 #define PB1176_CLCD_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_CLCD }
 #define SCTL_IRQ	{ }
 #define PB1176_WATCHDOG_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_WATCHDOG }
-#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ	{ IRQ_PB1176_GPIO0 }
+#define PB1176_GPIO0_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_GPIO0 }
 #define GPIO1_IRQ	{ IRQ_PB1176_GPIO1 }
 #define PB1176_RTC_IRQ	{ IRQ_DC1176_RTC }
 #define SCI_IRQ		{ IRQ_PB1176_SCI }

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help