From: Kukjin Kim <hidden> Date: 2011-08-11 07:11:05
Kyungmin Park wrote:
The following changes since commit
322a8b034003c0d46d39af85bf24fee27b902f48:
Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
Kyungmin Park (2):
ARM: exynos4: universal: Use the correct regulator names
ARM: exynos4: Use nr_irqs instead of NR_IRQS
Marek Szyprowski (5):
ARM: Exynos4: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to eint code
ARM: Samsung: Add chained enrty/exit call to timer interrupt handler
ARM: S5P: add required chained_irq_enter/exit to gpio-int code
ARM: Exynos4: use s5p-timer for UniversalC210 board
ARM: Samsung: fix watchdog reset issue with clk_get()
Sylwester Nawrocki (1):
ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix the IRQ definitions for MIPI CSIS device
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 3 +++
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/irqs.h | 5 ++---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-combiner.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/irq-eint.c | 7 +++++++
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c | 8 +++++---
arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/clock.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-s3c2443/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c | 2 ++
arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/s3c2410-clock.c | 1 +
arch/arm/plat-s5p/irq-gpioint.c | 6 ++++++
arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h | 2 ++
.../arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/watchdog-reset.h | 10 +++-------
arch/arm/plat-samsung/irq-vic-timer.c | 5 +++++
19 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not you.
Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung architecture
maintainer.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not you.
Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung architecture
maintainer.
I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
from you.
Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why
they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug
fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
* Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
so that they can get identified for backports.
* Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
* Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
Arnd
From: Kukjin Kim <hidden> Date: 2011-08-13 04:04:03
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
quoted
quoted
Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
quoted
No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not
you.
quoted
Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung
architecture
quoted
maintainer.
I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
from you.
Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why
they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug
fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
* Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
so that they can get identified for backports.
* Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
* Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
OK, I see.
As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
From: Kyungmin Park <hidden> Date: 2011-08-17 05:54:28
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Kukjin Kim [off-list ref] wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
quoted
quoted
? Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
? git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
quoted
No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not
you.
quoted
quoted
Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung
architecture
quoted
quoted
maintainer.
I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
from you.
Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why
they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug
fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
* Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
so that they can get identified for backports.
* Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
* Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
OK, I see.
As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week.
Do you need more time?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
From: Kukjin Kim <hidden> Date: 2011-08-19 05:24:09
Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Kukjin Kim [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
quoted
quoted
? Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
? git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
quoted
No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not
you.
quoted
quoted
Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung
architecture
quoted
quoted
maintainer.
I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
from you.
Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear
why
quoted
quoted
they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the
bug
quoted
quoted
fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
* Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc:
stable at kernel.org'
quoted
quoted
so that they can get identified for backports.
* Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
* Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
OK, I see.
As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week.
Do you need more time?
I will send before Arnd's sending for -rc3..maybe late tonight (KST).
Now I need to sort out current samsung-fixes...
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.