[PATCH] nmk-gpio: use request_irq instead of chained handler

STALE5640d

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-02-25 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] nmk-gpio: use request_irq instead of chained handler

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-25 16:59:53

2011/2/23 Will Deacon [off-list ref]:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 22:47, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
__nmk_gpio_irq_handler doesn't do anything more that what a normal handler
does, so it can become one. ?This is also needed for changing the GIC
implementation to a different flow handler.

Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <redacted>
mach-nomadik only seems to use the vic. Why does this GPIO handler
need updating?
plat-nomadik/gpio.c is also used by mach-ux500, which uses the GIC.
Ah yes, sorry I missed that one. I'm happy to include any patches from you
in the GIC fasteoi series if it makes merging easier.
OK if this one is OK I sure prefer that you take it in your series Will,
since you have the whole picture of what you want to do with the
GIC.

It'll likely collide with the stuff I have stacked up for the 2.6.39 merge
window though, which will be pull-requested any day now.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH] nmk-gpio: use request_irq instead of chained handler

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-25 17:16:25

Hi Linus,
2011/2/23 Will Deacon [off-list ref]:
quoted
quoted
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 22:47, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
__nmk_gpio_irq_handler doesn't do anything more that what a normal handler
does, so it can become one. ?This is also needed for changing the GIC
implementation to a different flow handler.

Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <redacted>
mach-nomadik only seems to use the vic. Why does this GPIO handler
need updating?
plat-nomadik/gpio.c is also used by mach-ux500, which uses the GIC.
Ah yes, sorry I missed that one. I'm happy to include any patches from you
in the GIC fasteoi series if it makes merging easier.
OK if this one is OK I sure prefer that you take it in your series Will,
since you have the whole picture of what you want to do with the
GIC.

It'll likely collide with the stuff I have stacked up for the 2.6.39 merge
window though, which will be pull-requested any day now.
Sure. I'll add a patch to my series that makes the minimal change required
and post it next week.

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help