[PATCH] ARM: Mark CPU_32v6K as depended on CPU_V7

CPU_32v6K is selected by CPU_V7 but it only depends on CPU_V6.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---

It would be nice to have this patch before 2.6.36 is released to avoid a
warning introduced by my kbuild patch to warn on selecting options with
unmet dependencies.

 arch/arm/mm/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
index 33c3f57..a0a2928 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig

@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ config CPU_V6
 # ARMv6k
 config CPU_32v6K
 	bool "Support ARM V6K processor extensions" if !SMP
-	depends on CPU_V6
+	depends on CPU_V6 || CPU_V7
 	default y if SMP && !(ARCH_MX3 || ARCH_OMAP2)
 	help
 	  Say Y here if your ARMv6 processor supports the 'K' extension.

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:52:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

CPU_32v6K is selected by CPU_V7 but it only depends on CPU_V6.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <redacted>

---

It would be nice to have this patch before 2.6.36 is released to avoid a
warning introduced by my kbuild patch to warn on selecting options with
unmet dependencies.

ack, too.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:52:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

CPU_32v6K is selected by CPU_V7 but it only depends on CPU_V6.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Ok.