Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: populate a pte entry before fetching it
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-01 09:58:49
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev
On 9/1/20 1:08 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 12:07 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:quoted
On 9/1/20 8:55 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:quoted
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:quoted
pte_clear_tests operate on an existing pte entry. Make sure that is not a none pte entry. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <redacted> --- mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c index 21329c7d672f..8527ebb75f2c 100644 --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static void __init pgd_populate_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgdp, static void __init pte_clear_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long vaddr) { - pte_t pte = ptep_get(ptep); + pte_t pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, vaddr, ptep);Seems like ptep_get_and_clear() here just clears the entry in preparation for a following set_pte_at() which otherwise would have been a problem on ppc64 as you had pointed out earlier i.e set_pte_at() should not update an existing valid entry. So the commit message here is bit misleading.and also fetch the pte value which is used further.quoted
quoted
pr_debug("Validating PTE clear\n"); pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) | RANDOM_ORVALUE);@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void) p4d_t *p4dp, *saved_p4dp; pud_t *pudp, *saved_pudp; pmd_t *pmdp, *saved_pmdp, pmd; - pte_t *ptep; + pte_t *ptep, pte; pgtable_t saved_ptep; pgprot_t prot, protnone; phys_addr_t paddr;@@ -1049,6 +1049,8 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void) */ ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmdp, vaddr, &ptl); + pte = pfn_pte(pte_aligned, prot); + set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte);Not here, creating and populating an entry must be done in respective test functions itself. Besides, this seems bit redundant as well. The test pte_clear_tests() with the above change added, already - Clears the PTEP entry with ptep_get_and_clear()and fetch the old value set previously.In that case, please move above two lines i.e pte = pfn_pte(pte_aligned, prot); set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte); from debug_vm_pgtable() to pte_clear_tests() and update it's arguments as required.
Frankly, I don't understand what these tests are testing. It all looks
like some random clear and set.
static void __init pte_clear_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep,
unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pfn,
pgprot_t prot)
{
pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte);
pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, vaddr, ptep);
pr_debug("Validating PTE clear\n");
pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) | RANDOM_ORVALUE);
set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte);
barrier();
pte_clear(mm, vaddr, ptep);
pte = ptep_get(ptep);
WARN_ON(!pte_none(pte));
}
-aneesh