# Re: \[RFC,PATCH\] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig

- From: H. Peter Anvin \<hpa@zytor.com\>
- Date: 2011-06-15 05:43:43 
- List: linux-arch
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arch/2011/06/8577828
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2011/06/8577797/t.md

```text
On 06/14/2011 09:40 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:18:36AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>>>
>>> There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
>>> used.  It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
>>> matrix for no good reason.
>>>
>>
>> I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS
>> SoCs are offered on x86 platforms?
>>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_make_a_right
> 

Except in this case it's not wrong.  It was done that way because it was
discovered a long time ago that restricting drivers that were not
*inherently* limited to specific platform just resulted in more bitrot
and nasty surprises for the users who *did* need specific things after
all, even though the maintainers had not thought so.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
```