Re: [PATCH v8 20/32] fanotify: Dynamically resize the FAN_FS_ERROR pool

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-10-21 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v8 20/32] fanotify: Dynamically resize the FAN_FS_ERROR pool

From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-21 18:17:42

Jan Kara [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue 19-10-21 08:50:23, Amir Goldstein wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:03 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Allow the FAN_FS_ERROR group mempool to grow up to an upper limit
dynamically, instead of starting already at the limit.  This doesn't
bother resizing on mark removal, but next time a mark is added, the slot
will be either reused or resized.  Also, if several marks are being
removed at once, most likely the group is going away anyway.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <redacted>
---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h   |  1 +
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index f77581c5b97f..a860c286e885 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -959,6 +959,10 @@ static int fanotify_remove_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,

        removed = fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask(fsn_mark, mask, flags,
                                                 umask, &destroy_mark);
+
+       if (removed & FAN_FS_ERROR)
+               group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks--;
+
        if (removed & fsnotify_conn_mask(fsn_mark->connector))
                fsnotify_recalc_mask(fsn_mark->connector);
        if (destroy_mark)
@@ -1057,12 +1061,24 @@ static struct fsnotify_mark *fanotify_add_new_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,

 static int fanotify_group_init_error_pool(struct fsnotify_group *group)
 {
-       if (mempool_initialized(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool))
-               return 0;
+       int ret;
+
+       if (group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks >=
+           FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_FEE_POOL)
+               return -ENOMEM;

-       return mempool_init_kmalloc_pool(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool,
-                                        FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_FEE_POOL,
-                                        sizeof(struct fanotify_error_event));
+       if (!mempool_initialized(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool))
+               ret = mempool_init_kmalloc_pool(
+                               &group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool,
+                                1, sizeof(struct fanotify_error_event));
+       else
+               ret = mempool_resize(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool,
+                                    group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks + 1);
+
+       if (!ret)
+               group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks++;
+
+       return ret;
 }
This is not what I had in mind.
I was thinking start with ~32 and double each time limit is reached.
Do you mean when number of FS_ERROR marks reaches the number of preallocated
events? We could do that but note that due to mempool implementation limits
there cannot be more than 255 preallocated events, also mempool_resize()
will only update number of slots for preallocated events but these slots
will be empty. You have to manually allocate and free events to fill these
slots with preallocated events.
quoted
And also, this code grows the pool to infinity with add/remove mark loop.
I see a cap at FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_FEE_POOL in the code there. But I don't
think there's a good enough reason to hard-limit number of FS_ERROR marks
at 128. As I explained in the previous version of the series, in vast
majority of cases we will not use even a single preallocated event...
quoted
Anyway, since I clearly did not understand how mempool works and
Jan had some different ideas I would leave it to Jan to explain
how he wants the mempool init limit and resize to be implemented.
Honestly, I'm for keeping it simple for now. Just 32 preallocated events
and try to come up with something more clever only if someone actually
complains.
So, If I understand correctly the conclusion, you are fine if I revert to
the version I had in v7: 32 fields pre-allocated, no dynamic growth and
just limit the number of FAN_FS_ERROR marks to <= 32?  In the future, if
this ever becomes a problem, we look into dynamic resizing/increasing
the limit?

I think either option is fine by me.  I thought that growing 1 by 1 like
I did here would be ugly, but before sending the patch, I checked and I
was quite satisfied with how simple mempool_resize actually is.

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Re: [PATCH v8 20/32] fanotify: Dynamically resize the FAN_FS_ERROR pool

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2021-10-21 19:29:53

On Thu 21-10-21 15:17:33, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
Jan Kara [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Tue 19-10-21 08:50:23, Amir Goldstein wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:03 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Allow the FAN_FS_ERROR group mempool to grow up to an upper limit
dynamically, instead of starting already at the limit.  This doesn't
bother resizing on mark removal, but next time a mark is added, the slot
will be either reused or resized.  Also, if several marks are being
removed at once, most likely the group is going away anyway.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <redacted>
---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h   |  1 +
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index f77581c5b97f..a860c286e885 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -959,6 +959,10 @@ static int fanotify_remove_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,

        removed = fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask(fsn_mark, mask, flags,
                                                 umask, &destroy_mark);
+
+       if (removed & FAN_FS_ERROR)
+               group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks--;
+
        if (removed & fsnotify_conn_mask(fsn_mark->connector))
                fsnotify_recalc_mask(fsn_mark->connector);
        if (destroy_mark)
@@ -1057,12 +1061,24 @@ static struct fsnotify_mark *fanotify_add_new_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,

 static int fanotify_group_init_error_pool(struct fsnotify_group *group)
 {
-       if (mempool_initialized(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool))
-               return 0;
+       int ret;
+
+       if (group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks >=
+           FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_FEE_POOL)
+               return -ENOMEM;

-       return mempool_init_kmalloc_pool(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool,
-                                        FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_FEE_POOL,
-                                        sizeof(struct fanotify_error_event));
+       if (!mempool_initialized(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool))
+               ret = mempool_init_kmalloc_pool(
+                               &group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool,
+                                1, sizeof(struct fanotify_error_event));
+       else
+               ret = mempool_resize(&group->fanotify_data.error_events_pool,
+                                    group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks + 1);
+
+       if (!ret)
+               group->fanotify_data.error_event_marks++;
+
+       return ret;
 }
This is not what I had in mind.
I was thinking start with ~32 and double each time limit is reached.
Do you mean when number of FS_ERROR marks reaches the number of preallocated
events? We could do that but note that due to mempool implementation limits
there cannot be more than 255 preallocated events, also mempool_resize()
will only update number of slots for preallocated events but these slots
will be empty. You have to manually allocate and free events to fill these
slots with preallocated events.
quoted
And also, this code grows the pool to infinity with add/remove mark loop.
I see a cap at FANOTIFY_DEFAULT_MAX_FEE_POOL in the code there. But I don't
think there's a good enough reason to hard-limit number of FS_ERROR marks
at 128. As I explained in the previous version of the series, in vast
majority of cases we will not use even a single preallocated event...
quoted
Anyway, since I clearly did not understand how mempool works and
Jan had some different ideas I would leave it to Jan to explain
how he wants the mempool init limit and resize to be implemented.
Honestly, I'm for keeping it simple for now. Just 32 preallocated events
and try to come up with something more clever only if someone actually
complains.
So, If I understand correctly the conclusion, you are fine if I revert to
the version I had in v7: 32 fields pre-allocated, no dynamic growth and
just limit the number of FAN_FS_ERROR marks to <= 32?
Yes to 32 preallocated events, no to FAN_FS_ERROR mark limit - just keep
number of marks unlimited. IMO it would be a hard to understand limit for
userspace.
In the future, if this ever becomes a problem, we look into dynamic
resizing/increasing the limit?
Yes.
I think either option is fine by me.  I thought that growing 1 by 1 like
I did here would be ugly, but before sending the patch, I checked and I
was quite satisfied with how simple mempool_resize actually is.
Yes, mempool resize is simple, except that you have to care not to resize
to more than 255 and also for mempool_resize() to guarantee anything you
have to allocate and free events to fill slots at which point things become
a bit ugly.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help