Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 4 authors, 2020-10-12

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86: Improve Minimum Alternate Stack Size

From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Date: 2020-10-06 17:00:29
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 08:33:47AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 10/6/20 8:25 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
quoted
Or are people reporting real stack overruns on x86 today?
We have real overruns.  We have ~2800 bytes of XSAVE (regisiter) state
mostly from AVX-512, and a 2048 byte MINSIGSTKSZ.
Right.  Out of interest, do you believe that's a direct consequence of
the larger kernel-generated signal frame, or does the expansion of
userspace stack frames play a role too?

In practice software just assumes SIGSTKSZ and then ignores the problem
until / unless an actual stack overflow is seen.

There's probably a lot of software out there whose stack is
theoretically too small even without AVX-512 etc. in the mix, especially
when considering the possibility of nested signals...

Cheers
---Dave
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help