# Re: \[PATCH v19 09/12\] arch: Wire up landlock() syscall

- From: Arnd Bergmann \<arnd@arndb.de\>
- Date: 2020-07-08 07:47:57 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2020/07/183726
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2020/07/183650/t.md

```text
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:31 AM Mickaël Salaün [ref] wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 09:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 PM Mickaël Salaün [ref] wrote:
> >
> >> index f4a01305d9a6..a63a411a74d5 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>
> OK, I'll rebase the next series on linux-next.

Just change the number to the next free one, without actually rebasing.
It's always a bit messy to have multiple syscalls added, but I think that
causes the least confusion.

> Do you know if there is other syscalls on their way to linux-next?

None that I'm aware of.

> Are the other parts of arch/syscall OK for you?

The arch/* and include/uapi/asm-generic changes look ok to me.
I'll reply to the syscall implementation separately/

     Arnd
```