# Re: \[PATCH v19 09/12\] arch: Wire up landlock() syscall

- From: Mickaël Salaün \<mic@digikod.net\>
- Date: 2020-07-08 07:32:10 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2020/07/183725
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2020/07/183650/t.md

```text

On 08/07/2020 09:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 PM Mickaël Salaün [ref] wrote:
> 
>> index f4a01305d9a6..a63a411a74d5 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>> @@ -857,9 +857,11 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_openat2, sys_openat2)
>>  __SYSCALL(__NR_pidfd_getfd, sys_pidfd_getfd)
>>  #define __NR_faccessat2 439
>>  __SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat2, sys_faccessat2)
>> +#define __NR_landlock 440
>> +__SYSCALL(__NR_landlock, sys_landlock)
>>
>>  #undef __NR_syscalls
>> -#define __NR_syscalls 440
>> +#define __NR_syscalls 441
> 
> In linux-next, we already have:
> 
> +#define __NR_watch_mount 440
> +#define __NR_watch_sb 441
> +#define __NR_fsinfo 442
> +#define __NR_process_madvise 443
> 
> You may want to increase the number again.
> 
>       Arnd
> 

OK, I'll rebase the next series on linux-next. Do you know if there is
other syscalls on their way to linux-next?

Are the other parts of arch/syscall OK for you?
```