# Re: \[RFC PATCH 1/2\] arm64: fpsimd: Fix bad si\_code for undiagnosed SIGFPE

- From: David Miller \<hidden\>
- Date: 2018-01-23 18:29:16 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2018/01/8764182
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2018/01/8764181/t.md

```text
From: <redacted> (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:27:16 -0600

> Dave Martin [ref] writes:
> 
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:13:08PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> However, the purpose of this as an RFC was to get feedback on whether
>> adding FPE_UNKNOWN is considered acceptable at all from an API
>> perspective -- the precise number doesn't matter for that discussion.
>>
>> Do you have any view on this?
> 
> That seems as good a solution as any too me.  It is reality and it
> happens in the code and there are several places of the same form I
> would use it, just to get rid of the FPE_FIXME.

Eric, feel free to do something similar on Sparc.
```