# Re: \[RESEND\]\[PATCH v4\] cgroup: Use CAP\_SYS\_RESOURCE to allow a process to migrate other tasks between cgroups

- From: Tejun Heo \<tj@kernel.org\>
- Date: 2016-12-09 13:27:31 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2016/12/4892410
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2016/11/4870472/t.md

```text
Hello, John.

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:39:38PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> So just to clarify the discussion for my purposes and make sure I
> understood, per-cgroup CAP rules was not desired, and instead we
> should either utilize an existing cap (are there still objections to
> CAP_SYS_RESOURCE? - this isn't clear to me) or create a new one (ie,
> bring back the older CAP_CGROUP_MIGRATE patch).

Let's create a new one.  It looks to be a bit too different to share
with an existing one.

> Tejun: Do you have a more finished version of your patch that I should
> add my changes on top of?

Oh, just submit the patch on top of the current for-next.  I can queue
mine on top of yours.  They are mostly orthogonal.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
```