# Re: \[PATCH RFC\] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic

- List: linux-api
- 2 messages, 2 authors
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2016/12/4892238/t

## Re: \[PATCH RFC\] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic

- From: Eric W. Biederman \<hidden\>
- Date: 2016-12-09 08:06:58 
- Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2016/12/4892238.md

```text
"Serge E. Hallyn" [ref] writes:

> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:43:09PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Serge E. Hallyn" [ref] writes:

>> Any chance of a singed-off-by?
>
> Yes, sorry, Stéphane had pointed out that I'd apparently forgotten to do
> -s.  Do you want me to resend the whole shebang, or does
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <redacted>
>
> suffice?  (My previous iterations did have it fwiw so I don't think I could
> legally disavow it now :)

I was really hoping to get this in this for 4.10, but I am seeing a couple
of little things in my review.  Comments referring to a non-existent v4
and a few other niggling little things so I am going to target this for
the next kernel release so there is time review.  With a little luck I
can place this patch in my for-next tree just after the merge window
closes and 4.10-rc1 ships.



Eric
```

## Re: \[PATCH RFC\] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic

- From: Serge E. Hallyn \<serge@hallyn.com\>
- Date: 2016-12-09 13:42:42 
- Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2016/12/4892422.md

```text
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org):
> "Serge E. Hallyn" [ref] writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:43:09PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Serge E. Hallyn" [ref] writes:
> 
> >> Any chance of a singed-off-by?
> >
> > Yes, sorry, Stéphane had pointed out that I'd apparently forgotten to do
> > -s.  Do you want me to resend the whole shebang, or does
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <redacted>
> >
> > suffice?  (My previous iterations did have it fwiw so I don't think I could
> > legally disavow it now :)
> 
> I was really hoping to get this in this for 4.10, but I am seeing a couple
> of little things in my review.  Comments referring to a non-existent v4
> and a few other niggling little things so I am going to target this for
> the next kernel release so there is time review.  With a little luck I
> can place this patch in my for-next tree just after the merge window
> closes and 4.10-rc1 ships.

Ok, thanks.  This is not something I'd want to rush :)
```