# Re: \[RFC PATCH v4 0/6\] (mostly) Arch-independent livepatch

- From: Josh Poimboeuf \<hidden\>
- Date: 2016-02-08 20:28:33 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2016/02/4680709
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2016/02/4677529/t.md

```text
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:54:22PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
> 
> > Jessica Yu (6):
> >   Elf: add livepatch-specific Elf constants
> >   module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules
> >   module: s390: keep mod_arch_specific for livepatch modules
> >   livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations
> >   samples: livepatch: mark as livepatch module
> >   Documentation: livepatch: outline Elf format and requirements for
> >     patch modules
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I walked through the code and it looks good except for several minor 
> things in the fourth patch (livepatch: reuse module loader code to write 
> relocations). I'd propose to send the next version as a regular PATCH set 
> and not RFC. We can start collecting Reviews and Acks. Hopefully it won't 
> take more than one or two iterations. Would that be ok with everyone?

Sounds good to me...

-- 
Josh
```