# Re: \[PATCH v4 5/5\] PCI: Handle Enhanced Allocation (EA) capability for bridges

- From: David Daney \<hidden\>
- Date: 2015-10-05 23:01:55 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2015/10/4590804
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-pci/2015/10/4589528/t.md

```text
On 10/05/2015 03:54 PM, Sean O. Stalley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 03:37:56PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney <redacted>
>>
>> PCI bridges may have their properties be specified via EA entries.
>>
>> Extend the EA parser to extract the bridge resources, and modify
>> pci_read_bridge_{io,mmio,mmio_pref}() to use resources previously
>> obtained via EA.
>>
>> Save the offset to the EA capability in struct pci_dev, and use it to
>> easily find the EA bridge subordinate and secondary bus numbers.
>>
>> When assigning the bridge resources a couple of changes are required
>> so that the EA obtained IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED are not resized, and
>> correctly linked into the resource tree.
>>
>> 1) In pbus_size_mem() do not attempt to resize the bridge resources if
>>     they are marked as IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED.
>>
>> 2) In pci_bus_alloc_from_region()for IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED resources, just
>>     try to request the resource as is, without attempting to resize it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <redacted>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/bus.c       |  7 +++++++
>>   drivers/pci/pci.c       | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   drivers/pci/probe.c     | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |  3 +++
>>   include/linux/pci.h     |  1 +
>>   5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> @@ -801,8 +813,23 @@ int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int max, int pass)
>>
>>   	pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, &buses);
>>   	primary = buses & 0xFF;
>> -	secondary = (buses >> 8) & 0xFF;
>> -	subordinate = (buses >> 16) & 0xFF;
>> +	if (dev->ea_cap) {
>> +		u32 dw1;
>> +
>> +		pci_read_config_dword(dev, dev->ea_cap + 4, &dw1);
>> +		if (dw1 & 0xFF)
>> +			secondary = dw1 & 0xFF;
>> +		else
>> +			secondary = (buses >> 8) & 0xFF;
>> +
>> +		if ((dw1 >> 8) & 0xFF)
>> +			subordinate = (dw1 >> 8) & 0xFF;
>> +		else
>> +			subordinate = (buses >> 16) & 0xFF;
>> +	} else {
>> +		secondary = (buses >> 8) & 0xFF;
>> +		subordinate = (buses >> 16) & 0xFF;
>> +	}
>
> We can refactor this to make it cleaner/more compact. from V3 review:
>
>
> 	secondary = (buses >> 8) & 0xFF;
> 	subordinate = (buses >> 16) & 0xFF;
> 	if (dev->ea_cap) {
> 		u32 sdw;
> 		
> 		pci_read_config_dword(dev, dev->ea_cap + 4, &sdw);
> 		
> 		if (sdw & 0xFF)
> 			secondary = sdw & 0xFF;
> 		
> 		sdw >>= 8;
> 		if (sdw & 0xFF)
> 			subordinate = sdw & 0xFF;
> 	}
>

Yes, that is cleaner.  I think I didn't read the comments on v3 closely enough.  I will switch to doing it this way.

Thanks,
David Daney


>
> -Sean
>
```