# Re: \[CFT\]\[PATCH 00/10\] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2)

- From: Richard Weinberger \<hidden\>
- Date: 2015-05-28 21:12:09 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2015/05/96460
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2015/05/96460/t.md

```text
Am 28.05.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Kenton Varda:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger [ref] wrote:
>> Am 28.05.2015 um 22:12 schrieb Kenton Varda:
>>> We never mount sysfs in Sandstorm.
>>
>> sysfs is ABI and applications depend on it.
>> Even glibc is using sysfs. Currently it has
>> fallback paths but these may go away...
> 
> Off-topic, but Sandstorm isn't intended to provide a full Linux ABI.
> It is intended to provide a secure sandbox that can run apps that have
> been explicitly ported to Sandstorm. More background if you're interested:

Ahh, the application needs to be Sandstorm aware.
I was missing that detail. Thanks for pointing that out!

Thanks,
//richard
```