Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
quoted
I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not going to spend
the necessary time unpaid.
Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your
request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want
it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you.
Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla
that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do that.
I've never demanded that someone else fixes it.
I've just explained a problem.
Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to
fix it or by fixing it themself ...
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:12:52 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <redacted>
To: Lukáš Czerner <redacted>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <redacted>,
Al Viro [off-list ref], Theodore Ts'o [off-list ref],
Linux-Fsdevel [off-list ref],
Linux Kernel [off-list ref],
Linux API [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)
Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:quoted
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
quoted
quoted
I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not going to spend
the necessary time unpaid.
Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your
request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want
it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you.
Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla
that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do that.
I've never demanded that someone else fixes it.
I've just explained a problem.
Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to
fix it or by fixing it themself ...
It's not a bug, you're requesting a feature.