# Re: \[PATCH 4/4\] vfs: RWF\_NONBLOCK flag for preadv2 - From: Milosz Tanski \ - Date: 2014-10-24 17:16:04 - List: linux-api - Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2014/10/89286 - Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fsdevel/2014/10/89283/t.md ```text On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Jeff Moyer [ref] wrote: > Milosz Tanski [ref] writes: > >> Filesystems that generic_file_read_iter will not be allowed to perform >> non-blocking reads. This only will read data if it's in the page cache and if >> there is no page error (causing a re-read). >> >> Christoph Hellwig wrote the filesystem specify code (cifs, ofs, shm, xfs). >> >> Signed-off-by: Milosz Tanski > > Add in the 2 hunks from the other patches, as suggested by Christoph, > and you can add my: > > Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer I'm aware of the 3 patch series that Christoph sent out shortly after the previous version of the patchset. Wasn't sure what to do about it. Christoph, should I apply your last 3 patches to the end of this tree and send it along with the next submission? Or should I take the first two combine them with this change and then apply RWF_DSYNC ontop of it? - M -- Milosz Tanski CTO 16 East 34th Street, 15th floor New York, NY 10016 p: 646-253-9055 e: milosz@adfin.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: aart@kvack.org ```