# Re: \[BUG\] Generic syscalls -- chmod vs. fchmodat

- From: Mike Frysinger \<hidden\>
- Date: 2011-01-25 18:54:35 
- List: linux-api
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2011/01/3669730
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2011/01/3669681/t.md

```text
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 13:21:14 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 January 2011 18:45:15 Roland McGrath wrote:
> >  I know of no reason to
> > 
> > think that the current treatment of the empty string was ever intended at
> > the creation of the *at interfaces.
> 
> I always assumed that this was done so that the *at syscalls can replace
> both the ones that take a file descriptor (e.g. fstat) and the ones that
> take a pathname (e.g. stat), which is sensible for the non-AT_FDCWD case,
> although not documented in the man pages.
> 
> Treating the empty string special for AT_FDCWD is rather pointless, but
> at least consistent.

i dont know if the gnulib peeps are on these lists, but i think their 
implementations of some of the *at funcs leverage the extended behavior that 
is available under Linux.  or at least, i'm certain they'll have some insight 
into some of these nuances.
-mike
```

## Attachments

- [signature.asc](https://ratatoskr.run/linux-api/2011/01/3669730/attachment/0) (application/pgp-signature, 836 bytes)