RE: [PATCH] ACPI/Processor: C1/C3 states promotion and demotion
From: Ow Mun Heng <hidden>
Date: 2004-02-10 03:21:20
-----Original Message----- From: eric.piel-VkQ1JFuSMpfAbQlEx87xDw@public.gmane.org [mailto:eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:07 PM To: len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Subject: [ACPI] [PATCH] ACPI/Processor: C1/C3 states promotion and
Some processors seems to support only C1 and C3 states, for instance... mine ;-) (Pentium III Coppermine). The problem is that, in this case, no promotion or demotion are linking those two states, therefore the preocessor never goes to C3!
Hmmm so.. your processor only has C1 and C3 and no C2 right?? and you're saying since there's no C2, it will never go to c3
The attached patch (against kernel 2.6.1) should do the trick, that's mainly a copy-paste of the C2/C3 code. It works fine on my computer (and the temperature really goes down :-) ).
Any idea what is 'threshold_count' and 'latency_ticks' and what it does? My Processor Pentium M doen't go to C3 much. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn