RE: Battery "design capacity" incorrect
From: Grover, Andrew <hidden>
Date: 2003-03-03 19:11:05
From: Matthew Keller [mailto:mgkeller-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org]quoted
quoted
design capacity: 5400 mWhSo it always returns 5400 mWh, no matter what, is what Ithink you'requoted
saying, yes?
Correct. My main question is where is ACPI "getting" the 5400 from? Various Windows tools, and even the manufacturer's specs claim "3860" or "3870" as the capacity (tools and manufacturer respectively). I've changed various Linux tools that I've written to do the math based on the "last full capacity", but a lot of "other people's tools" use "design capacity" which is "better", in my opinion as it can let you know if you're having a calibration problem.
ACPI is getting the 5400 by calling the _BIF control method, which returns that value - i.e. from the BIOS. I'd have to see the ASL to know whether the BIOS is dynamically determining that, or not. Regards -- Andy ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf