Re: [igt-dev] [i-g-t] intel-ci: balcklist gem_exec_alignment@pi-shared
From: Petri Latvala <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-24 11:56:29
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 05:02:32PM +0530, Mastan Katragadda wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
black list the test until locking contentions got fixed in kernel Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda <redacted> --- tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt index ca361fde..8e9767b1 100644 --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@off ############################################### # GEM: Not worth fixing ############################################### +igt@gem_exec_alignment@pi-shared igt@gen7_exec_parse@.*lri.*
"Not worth fixing" and "until fixed" are different messages. This needs a bug report link, and some asssessment in the commit message that gives rationale for not running this test while there's a lock contention bug. A quick look at one result for that test just says it fails, it doesn't even taint the kernel. Why does it need blacklisting? -- Petri Latvala