Inter-revision diff: cover letter

Comparing v2 (message) to v1 (message)

--- v2
+++ v1
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
-An early re-roll due to some very good & early review by Taylor Blau,
-this also fixes the grammar/typo pointed out by Eric Sunshine. Thanks
-both:
+The just-landed 6f64eeab605 (Merge branch
+'es/trace2-log-parent-process-name', 2021-08-24) added parent process
+name logging, but under Linux we'd only log the immediate parent, and
+the full process chain on Windows.
 
-This should address all the comments Taylor brought up, and hopefully
-a bit more. The only thing I left outstanding was the inclusion of the
-"while we're at it" enum refactoring in 5/6. It's not necessary for
-the end-state here, but I think since we're already reviewing most of
-this file it makes sense to change it while we're at it to
-future-proof the code vis-as-vis getting stricted checks from the
-compiler.
+This brings the Linux implementation in parity with the Windows
+implementation. As it turns out /proc/<PID>/stat is a bit of a pain to
+parse.
+
+This is preceded by some minor memory leak fixes to
+es/trace2-log-parent-process-name, and the fixing of a bug where we'd
+log the empty string as a parent if we didn't have procfs.
 
 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (6):
   tr2: remove NEEDSWORK comment for "non-procfs" implementations
@@ -18,291 +19,10 @@
   tr2: do compiler enum check in trace2_collect_process_info()
   tr2: log N parent process names on Linux
 
- compat/linux/procinfo.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
+ compat/linux/procinfo.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  trace2/tr2_tls.c        |   1 +
- 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
+ 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
 
-Range-diff against v1:
-1:  8c649ce3b49 = 1:  8c649ce3b49 tr2: remove NEEDSWORK comment for "non-procfs" implementations
-2:  0150e3402a7 = 2:  0150e3402a7 tr2: clarify TRACE2_PROCESS_INFO_EXIT comment under Linux
-3:  1fa1bbb6743 ! 3:  1d835d6767e tr2: stop leaking "thread_name" memory
-    @@ Commit message
-         Fix a memory leak introduced in ee4512ed481 (trace2: create new
-         combined trace facility, 2019-02-22), we were doing a free() of other
-         memory allocated in tr2tls_create_self(), but not the "thread_name"
-    -    "strbuf strbuf".
-    +    "struct strbuf".
-     
-         Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
-     
-4:  73e7d4eb6ac ! 4:  1aa0dbc394e tr2: fix memory leak & logic error in 2f732bf15e6
-    @@ Commit message
-         It was also using the strvec_push() API the wrong way. That API always
-         does an xstrdup(), so by detaching the strbuf here we'd leak
-         memory. Let's instead pass in our pointer for strvec_push() to
-    -    xstrdup(), and then free our own strbuf.
-    +    xstrdup(), and then free our own strbuf. I do have some WIP changes to
-    +    make strvec_push_nodup() non-static, which makes this and some other
-    +    callsites nicer, but let's just follow the prevailing pattern of using
-    +    strvec_push() for now.
-     
-    -    Furthermore we need to free that "procfs_path" strbuf whether or not
-    +    We'll also need to free that "procfs_path" strbuf whether or not
-         strbuf_read_file() succeeds, which was another source of memory leaks
-         in 2f732bf15e6, i.e. we'd leak that memory as well if we weren't on a
-         system where we could read the file from procfs.
-     
-    +    Let's move all the freeing of the memory to the end of the
-    +    function. If we're still at STRBUF_INIT with "name" due to not haven
-    +    taken the branch where the strbuf_read_file() succeeds freeing it is
-    +    redundant, so we could move it into the body of the "if", but just
-    +    handling freeing the same way for all branches of the function makes
-    +    it more readable.
-    +
-         In combination with the preceding commit this makes all of
-         t[0-9]*trace2*.sh pass under SANITIZE=leak on Linux.
-     
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c: static void get_ancestry_names(struct strvec *names)
-      		strbuf_trim_trailing_newline(&name);
-     -		strvec_push(names, strbuf_detach(&name, NULL));
-     +		strvec_push(names, name.buf);
-    -+		strbuf_release(&name);
-      	}
-      
-     +	strbuf_release(&procfs_path);
-    ++	strbuf_release(&name);
-    ++
-      	return;
-      }
-      
-5:  4e378da2cce = 5:  70fef093d8d tr2: do compiler enum check in trace2_collect_process_info()
-6:  da003330800 ! 6:  f6aac902484 tr2: log N parent process names on Linux
-    @@ Commit message
-         on Linux only the name of the immediate parent process was logged.
-     
-         Extend the functionality added there to also log full parent chain on
-    -    Linux. In 2f732bf15e6 it was claimed that "further ancestry info can
-    -    be gathered with procfs, but it's unwieldy to do so.".
-    -
-    -    I don't know what the author meant by that, but I think it probably
-    -    referred to needing to slurp this up from the FS, as opposed to having
-    -    an API. The underlying semantics on Linux are easier to deal with than
-    -    on Windows though, at least as far as finding the parent PIDs
-    -    goes. See the get_processes() function used on Windows. As shown in
-    -    353d3d77f4f (trace2: collect Windows-specific process information,
-    -    2019-02-22) it needs to deal with cycles.
-    -
-    -    What is more complex on Linux is getting at the process name, a
-    -    simpler approach is to use fscanf(), see [1] for an implementation of
-    -    that, but as noted in the comment being added here it would fail in
-    -    the face of some weird process names, so we need our own
-    -    parse_proc_stat() to parse it out.
-    +    Linux.
-    +
-    +    This requires us to lookup "/proc/<getppid()>/stat" instead of
-    +    "/proc/<getppid()>/comm". The "comm" file just contains the name of the
-    +    process, but the "stat" file has both that information, and the parent
-    +    PID of that process, see procfs(5). We parse out the parent PID of our
-    +    own parent, and recursively walk the chain of "/proc/*/stat" files all
-    +    the way up the chain. A parent PID of 0 indicates the end of the
-    +    chain.
-    +
-    +    It's possible given the semantics of Linux's PID files that we end up
-    +    getting an entirely nonsensical chain of processes. It could happen if
-    +    e.g. we have a chain of processes like:
-    +
-    +        1 (init) => 321 (bash) => 123 (git)
-    +
-    +    Let's assume that "bash" was started a while ago, and that as shown
-    +    the OS has already cycled back to using a lower PID for us than our
-    +    parent process. In the time it takes us to start up and get to
-    +    trace2_collect_process_info(TRACE2_PROCESS_INFO_STARTUP) our parent
-    +    process might exit, and be replaced by an entirely different process!
-    +
-    +    We'd racily look up our own getppid(), but in the meantime our parent
-    +    would exit, and Linux would have cycled all the way back to starting
-    +    an entirely unrelated process as PID 321.
-    +
-    +    If that happens we'll just silently log incorrect data in our ancestry
-    +    chain. Luckily we don't need to worry about this except in this
-    +    specific cycling scenario, as Linux does not have PID
-    +    randomization. It appears it once did through a third-party feature,
-    +    but that it was removed around 2006[1]. For anyone worried about this
-    +    edge case raising PID_MAX via "/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max" will mitigate
-    +    it, but not eliminate it.
-    +
-    +    One thing we don't need to worry about is getting into an infinite
-    +    loop when walking "/proc/*/stat". See 353d3d77f4f (trace2: collect
-    +    Windows-specific process information, 2019-02-22) for the related
-    +    Windows code that needs to deal with that, and [2] for an explanation
-    +    of that edge case.
-    +
-    +    Aside from potential race conditions it's also a bit painful to
-    +    correctly parse the process name out of "/proc/*/stat". A simpler
-    +    approach is to use fscanf(), see [3] for an implementation of that,
-    +    but as noted in the comment being added here it would fail in the face
-    +    of some weird process names, so we need our own parse_proc_stat() to
-    +    parse it out.
-     
-         With this patch the "ancestry" chain for a trace2 event might look
-         like this:
-    @@ Commit message
-               "systemd"
-             ]
-     
-    -    And in the case of naughty process names. This uses perl's ability to
-    -    use prctl(PR_SET_NAME, ...). See Perl/perl5@7636ea95c5 (Set the legacy
-    -    process name with prctl() on assignment to $0 on Linux, 2010-04-15)[2]:
-    +    And in the case of naughty process names like the following. This uses
-    +    perl's ability to use prctl(PR_SET_NAME, ...). See
-    +    Perl/perl5@7636ea95c5 (Set the legacy process name with prctl() on
-    +    assignment to $0 on Linux, 2010-04-15)[4]:
-     
-             $ perl -e '$0 = "(naughty\nname)"; system "GIT_TRACE2_EVENT=/dev/stdout ~/g/git/git version"' | grep ancestry | jq -r .ancestry
-             [
-    @@ Commit message
-               "systemd"
-             ]
-     
-    -    1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87o8agp29o.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
-    -    2. https://github.com/Perl/perl5/commit/7636ea95c57762930accf4358f7c0c2dec086b5e
-    +    1. https://grsecurity.net/news#grsec2110
-    +    2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/48a62d5e-28e2-7103-a5bb-5db7e197a4b9@jeffhostetler.com/
-    +    3. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87o8agp29o.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
-    +    4. https://github.com/Perl/perl5/commit/7636ea95c57762930accf4358f7c0c2dec086b5e
-     
-         Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
-     
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c
-      
-     -static void get_ancestry_names(struct strvec *names)
-     +/*
-    -+ * We need more complex parsing instat_parent_pid() and
-    ++ * We need more complex parsing in stat_parent_pid() and
-     + * parse_proc_stat() below than a dumb fscanf(). That's because while
-     + * the statcomm field is surrounded by parentheses, the process itself
-     + * is free to insert any arbitrary byte sequence its its name. That
-    -+ * can include newlines, spaces, closing parentheses etc. See
-    -+ * do_task_stat() in fs/proc/array.c in linux.git, this is in contrast
-    -+ * with the escaped version of the name found in /proc/%d/status.
-    ++ * can include newlines, spaces, closing parentheses etc.
-    ++ *
-    ++ * See do_task_stat() in fs/proc/array.c in linux.git, this is in
-    ++ * contrast with the escaped version of the name found in
-    ++ * /proc/%d/status.
-     + *
-     + * So instead of using fscanf() we'll read N bytes from it, look for
-     + * the first "(", and then the last ")", anything in-between is our
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c
-     + * that's 7 digits for a PID. We have 2 PIDs in the first four fields
-     + * we're interested in, so 2 * 7 = 14.
-     + *
-    -+ * We then have 4 spaces between those four values, which brings us up
-    -+ * to 18. Add the two parentheses and it's 20. The "state" is then one
-    -+ * character (now at 21).
-    ++ * We then have 3 spaces between those four values, and we'd like to
-    ++ * get to the space between the 4th and the 5th (the "pgrp" field) to
-    ++ * make sure we read the entire "ppid" field. So that brings us up to
-    ++ * 14 + 3 + 1 = 18. Add the two parentheses around the "comm" value
-    ++ * and it's 20. The "state" value itself is then one character (now at
-    ++ * 21).
-     + *
-     + * Finally the maximum length of the "comm" name itself is 15
-     + * characters, e.g. a setting of "123456789abcdefg" will be truncated
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c
-     +static int parse_proc_stat(struct strbuf *sb, struct strbuf *name,
-     +			    int *statppid)
-      {
-    -+	const char *lhs = strchr(sb->buf, '(');
-    -+	const char *rhs = strrchr(sb->buf, ')');
-    ++	const char *comm_lhs = strchr(sb->buf, '(');
-    ++	const char *comm_rhs = strrchr(sb->buf, ')');
-     +	const char *ppid_lhs, *ppid_rhs;
-     +	char *p;
-     +	pid_t ppid;
-     +
-    -+	if (!lhs || !rhs)
-    ++	if (!comm_lhs || !comm_rhs)
-     +		goto bad_kernel;
-     +
-      	/*
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c
-     +	 * We're at the ")", that's followed by " X ", where X is a
-     +	 * single "state" character. So advance by 4 bytes.
-      	 */
-    -+	ppid_lhs = rhs + 4;
-    ++	ppid_lhs = comm_rhs + 4;
-     +
-    ++	/*
-    ++	 * Read until the space between the "ppid" and "pgrp" fields
-    ++	 * to make sure we're anchored after the untruncated "ppid"
-    ++	 * field..
-    ++	 */
-     +	ppid_rhs = strchr(ppid_lhs, ' ');
-     +	if (!ppid_rhs)
-     +		goto bad_kernel;
-     +
-     +	ppid = strtol(ppid_lhs, &p, 10);
-     +	if (ppid_rhs == p) {
-    -+		const char *comm = lhs + 1;
-    -+		int commlen = rhs - lhs - 1;
-    ++		const char *comm = comm_lhs + 1;
-    ++		size_t commlen = comm_rhs - comm;
-     +
-    -+		strbuf_addf(name, "%.*s", commlen, comm);
-    ++		strbuf_add(name, comm, commlen);
-     +		*statppid = ppid;
-     +
-     +		return 0;
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c
-      	struct strbuf procfs_path = STRBUF_INIT;
-     -	struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
-     +	struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
-    -+	size_t n;
-    -+	FILE *fp = NULL;
-    ++	FILE *fp;
-     +	int ret = -1;
-      
-      	/* try to use procfs if it's present. */
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c
-     -	if (strbuf_read_file(&name, procfs_path.buf, 0) > 0) {
-     -		strbuf_trim_trailing_newline(&name);
-     -		strvec_push(names, name.buf);
-    --		strbuf_release(&name);
-     -	}
-     +	strbuf_addf(&procfs_path, "/proc/%d/stat", pid);
-     +	fp = fopen(procfs_path.buf, "r");
-     +	if (!fp)
-     +		goto cleanup;
-     +
-    -+	n = strbuf_fread(&sb, STAT_PARENT_PID_READ_N, fp);
-    -+	if (n != STAT_PARENT_PID_READ_N)
-    ++	/*
-    ++	 * We could be more strict here and assert that we read at
-    ++	 * least STAT_PARENT_PID_READ_N. My reading of procfs(5) is
-    ++	 * that on any modern kernel (at least since 2.6.0 released in
-    ++	 * 2003) even if all the mandatory numeric fields were zero'd
-    ++	 * out we'd get at least 100 bytes, but let's just check that
-    ++	 * we got anything at all and trust the parse_proc_stat()
-    ++	 * function to handle its "Bad Kernel?" error checking.
-    ++	 */
-    ++	if (!strbuf_fread(&sb, STAT_PARENT_PID_READ_N, fp))
-     +		goto cleanup;
-     +	if (parse_proc_stat(&sb, name, statppid) < 0)
-     +		goto cleanup;
-    @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c
-     +	if (ppid)
-     +		push_ancestry_name(names, ppid);
-     +cleanup:
-    -+	strbuf_release(&name);
-    - 	return;
-    - }
-    + 	strbuf_release(&name);
-      
-    + 	return;
-     @@ compat/linux/procinfo.c: void trace2_collect_process_info(enum trace2_process_info_reason reason)
-      		 */
-      		break;
 -- 
 2.33.0.733.ga72a4f1c2e1
 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help