I suspect we can use the same idea and add a relative path in $PATH
for the test, perhaps, even though it is not a good coding
discipline. If $PWD, instead of $(pwd), works, it is perfectly OK.
Will queue. Thanks.
I suspect we can use the same idea and add a relative path in $PATH
for the test, perhaps, even though it is not a good coding
discipline. If $PWD, instead of $(pwd), works, it is perfectly OK.
Will queue. Thanks.
Appreciate for the quick fix, Patrick.
Homebrew upgraded their formulas to 2.47 rather quickly (the next day
after release) —
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/commit/0435f258701abd3acb9e2f4cd758cc13aa93997c
Mac users who do a `brew install git` would now install versions with
a broken maintenance command.
Fortunately, `brew` auto-updates the world every time a user installs
anything so it's likely they get to a 2.47.1 in the future,
but that still might be a while away from when they install the
current latest (2.47.0).
I'm not sure if Git has a hotfix workflow, but it might make sense to
prevent more users from getting onto the buggy version
(especially since repo admins usually set up maintenance in the
background and the error might not be evident to users).
I suspect we can use the same idea and add a relative path in $PATH
for the test, perhaps, even though it is not a good coding
discipline. If $PWD, instead of $(pwd), works, it is perfectly OK.
Will queue. Thanks.
Appreciate for the quick fix, Patrick.
Homebrew upgraded their formulas to 2.47 rather quickly (the next day
after release) —
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/commit/0435f258701abd3acb9e2f4cd758cc13aa93997c
Mac users who do a `brew install git` would now install versions with
a broken maintenance command.
Fortunately, `brew` auto-updates the world every time a user installs
anything so it's likely they get to a 2.47.1 in the future,
but that still might be a while away from when they install the
current latest (2.47.0).
I'm not sure if Git has a hotfix workflow, but it might make sense to
prevent more users from getting onto the buggy version
(especially since repo admins usually set up maintenance in the
background and the error might not be evident to users).
I'm not sure around the timeline for Git v2.47.1, and Junio is going to
be out of office for two weeks, so it may take a while. I'd recommend to
backport the patch for now.
Patrick
From: Taylor Blau <hidden> Date: 2024-10-15 00:36:18
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:38:43AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
I'm not sure around the timeline for Git v2.47.1, and Junio is going to
be out of office for two weeks, so it may take a while. I'd recommend to
backport the patch for now.
I'm not planning on cutting any release while Junio is gone, so I'd
expect that a hypothetical 2.47.1 release wouldn't occur until the
beginning of November at the earliest.
Thanks,
Taylor