# Re: \[PATCH v4 3/3\] t4113: put executable lines to test\_expect\_success

- From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason \<hidden\>
- Date: 2023-02-06 21:52:13 
- List: git
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/git/2023/02/7964652
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/git/2023/01/7964249/t.md

```text

On Mon, Feb 06 2023, Shuqi Liang wrote:

. ./test-lib.sh
>  
> -# setup
> -
> -cat >test-patch <<\EOF
> -diff --git a/file b/file
> ---- a/file
> -+++ b/file
> -@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> - a
> - b
> -+c
> -EOF
> -
> -echo 'a' >file
> -echo 'b' >>file
> -echo 'c' >>file
> -
>  test_expect_success setup '
> +	cat >test-patch <<-\EOF
> +	diff --git a/file b/file
> +	--- a/file
> +	+++ b/file
> +	@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> +	a
> +	b
> +	+c
> +	EOF
> +
> +	echo 'a' >file
> +	echo 'b' >>file
> +	echo 'c' >>file

I have not read the rest here, but this immediately fails with a very
large error from chain-lint by default, and even if you manually disable
it (which I assume you're doing, or just not testing these at all before
submission), you'll get:
	
	$ ./t4113-apply-ending.sh --no-chain-lint
	ok 1 - setup
	ok 2 - apply at the end
	ok 3 - apply at the beginning
	./t4113-apply-ending.sh: 44: b: not found
	./t4113-apply-ending.sh: 48: c
	        git update-index file
	        test_must_fail git apply --index test-patch
	: not found
	# passed all 3 test(s)
	1..3

Which shows that even with the &&-chaining fixed you have quoting issues
here, you're trying to execute 'b' etc.

I didn't read the rest of this topic, but please test with chain-lint,
see if there's any unexpected new output from the tests etc. before a v5
re-roll.
```