Re: Fw: Curiosity

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-12-18 · open the first message on its own page

Re: Fw: Curiosity

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-18 00:24:38

João Victor Bonfim  [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I suspect that for most algorithms and their implementations, this would

not result in repeatable "recompressed" results. Thus the checked-out

files might be different every time you checked them out. :(
How or why?

Sincere question.
Two immediate things that come to my mind are lossy compression
algorithms (jpeg pictures?) and compressors that do not necessarily
produce bit-for-bit identical results (e.g. gzip by default embeds
timestamp unless explicitly told not to from a command line option).

Re: Fw: Curiosity

From: João Victor Bonfim <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-18 00:50:25

Yeah, that sounds reasonable, Junio.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Em sexta-feira, 17 de dezembro de 2021 às 21:24, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] escreveu:
João Victor Bonfim JoaoVictorBonfim@protonmail.com writes:
quoted
quoted
I suspect that for most algorithms and their implementations, this would

not result in repeatable "recompressed" results. Thus the checked-out

files might be different every time you checked them out. :(
How or why?

Sincere question.
Two immediate things that come to my mind are lossy compression

algorithms (jpeg pictures?) and compressors that do not necessarily

produce bit-for-bit identical results (e.g. gzip by default embeds

timestamp unless explicitly told not to from a command line option).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help