Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Carlo Arenas [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:27 AM Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I had an impression that it was claimed that without this, the other
weatherbaloon for "for (type var=..." would not fly in some of the
jobs we have at CI?
It wouldn't if we have a CI job that tests with gcc < 5 but the last
version of that job died with travis-ci.org
I was wondering how Dscho's test was not failing, and that is an
easy answer to that question ;-)
If we wanted to resurrect that CI job, we can always add it in the
CI definition anyway, so I am OK with that, too.
But if we were to do so, perhaps we'd want something like what I
gave at https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqy25lwa86.fsf@gitster.g/ in
its place to avoid confusing people.
Let me update that topic before dropping the one under discussion.
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Carlo Arenas [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:27 AM Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I had an impression that it was claimed that without this, the other
weatherbaloon for "for (type var=..." would not fly in some of the
jobs we have at CI?
It wouldn't if we have a CI job that tests with gcc < 5 but the last
version of that job died with travis-ci.org
I was wondering how Dscho's test was not failing, and that is an
easy answer to that question ;-)
If we wanted to resurrect that CI job, we can always add it in the
CI definition anyway, so I am OK with that, too.
But if we were to do so, perhaps we'd want something like what I
gave at https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqy25lwa86.fsf@gitster.g/ in
its place to avoid confusing people.
That sounds like a good course of action to me.
Please note that the MSVC-related adjustment of the `FLEX_ARRAY` block is
still needed, I think.
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: In case it was not clear yet, I am in favor of going forward with
the C99 weather balloon. We should try to move in that direction, slowly
and gently, as is our custom.