Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #03; Tue, 9)

Emily Shaffer [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

* gc/remote-with-fewer-static-global-variables (2021-10-28) 6 commits
 - remote: add struct repository parameter to external functions
 - remote: die if branch is not found in repository
 - remote: remove the_repository->remote_state from static methods
 - remote: use remote_state parameter internally
 - remote: move static variables into per-repository struct
 - t5516: add test case for pushing remote refspecs

 Code clean-up to eventually allow information on remotes defined
 for an arbitrary repository to be read.

 Will merge to 'next'?

What's still blocking this from being merged? Anything? Release
schedule?

I do not think I saw anybody giving sufficient review on any
previous rounds or the latest round.  I did read some part and
commented on earlier rounds, during the -rc period, I don't have
enough concentration to judge a new design properly myself.

So, in short, these patches are unreviewed yet, if I am not
mistaken.

Thanks.

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Emily Shaffer [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

* gc/remote-with-fewer-static-global-variables (2021-10-28) 6 commits
 - remote: add struct repository parameter to external functions
 - remote: die if branch is not found in repository
 - remote: remove the_repository->remote_state from static methods
 - remote: use remote_state parameter internally
 - remote: move static variables into per-repository struct
 - t5516: add test case for pushing remote refspecs

 Code clean-up to eventually allow information on remotes defined
 for an arbitrary repository to be read.

 Will merge to 'next'?

What's still blocking this from being merged? Anything? Release
schedule?

I do not think I saw anybody giving sufficient review on any
previous rounds or the latest round.  I did read some part and
commented on earlier rounds, during the -rc period, I don't have
enough concentration to judge a new design properly myself.

So, in short, these patches are unreviewed yet, if I am not
mistaken.

Thanks for clarifying, Emily and I were under the impression that this
would be merged soon. I'll ask for more reviews.