# Re: changing the experimental 'git switch'

- From: Junio C Hamano \<hidden\>
- Date: 2021-10-21 23:03:39 
- List: git
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/git/2021/10/7905864

```text
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [ref] writes:

>     | Switch with --merge       | git switch -m branch   | git switch --merge branch |
>     | Create                    | git switch -c new      | git switch -n new         |
>     | Create from existing      | N/A                    | git switch -c new [<old>] |

I agree that adding a way to "clone", which is missing from
"checkout/switch/branch", is a good idea.  I do not necessarily
think it is a good idea to say "-n" is "new" or "-c" is not "create"
but is "clone/copy".  As you said yourself in a later paragraph,
"-n" sometimes is "--dry-run", and as we can see here "-c" in the
context of a command that can create and clone (with two verbs
behaving differently) is ambiguous.

Starting with a spelled out --copy vs --create without muddying the
water with -n may be a sensible way forward.
```