Re: [PATCH v4 05/25] midx: clear auxiliary .rev after replacing the MIDX
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 06:01:29
Taylor Blau [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 03:06:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:quoted
FWIW, here is what I have somewhere in 'seen' where two topics meet.Oops, one change missed.Thanks; that matches my own resolution. I noticed that it does fail the new test in t5319, since writing a MIDX wants to make sure that we are only touching an alternate's object directory (which will fail if we are running `git multi-pack-index` from outside of a repository). My opinion is that we should require being inside of a repository to run the MIDX builtin. Otherwise we're allowing that command to modify any old MIDX, which doesn't make sense. I think we probably need a single unifying topic, so I'm happy if you want to discard one of our two topics from seen in the meantime.
It seems that the *.rev test (probably added by the other topic that is a single patch fix) fails under sha256 hash. I am not going to dig it any further myself, but for the interested, CI breakage is here: https://github.com/git/git/runs/3440068613?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:1219 Thanks.