"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref]
writes:
From: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
---
whats-cooking: fix a couple of typos
I noticed a couple of typos while reading the most recent "What's
cooking" mail.
Thanks.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=codepath,code%20path
makes it clear that "code path" is how the phrase is typically
written, but we have 233 instances of 'codepath' in our tree vs only
39 of 'code path', according to "git grep" X-<.
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref]
writes:
quoted
From: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
---
whats-cooking: fix a couple of typos
I noticed a couple of typos while reading the most recent "What's
cooking" mail.
Thanks.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=codepath,code%20path
makes it clear that "code path" is how the phrase is typically
written, but we have 233 instances of 'codepath' in our tree vs only
39 of 'code path', according to "git grep" X-<.
Right. Where coding style is concerned, I prefer to go by what I find in
Git's source code, if only to avoid disrupting readers unnecessarily.
However, when it comes to English grammar and customs, I am fully aware
that many contributors aren't native speakers. Myself included. Therefore,
I trust spell checkers more than our source code on those matters (except
when it comes to those Git-isms like "submodule", "reftable", or
"superproject").
If you feel strongly, please feel free to drop everything except the
"submoudle" -> "submodule" fix.
Ciao,
Dscho