Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2021, #02; Tue, 3)

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-04 · open the first message on its own page

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2021, #02; Tue, 3)

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-04 17:57:22

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
* ab/test-columns (2021-08-02) 3 commits
 - test-lib.sh: use GIT_TEST_COLUMNS over COLUMNS
 - test-lib-functions.sh: add a test_with_columns function
 - test-lib-functions.sh: rename test_must_fail_acceptable()
We're going to need this or another solution to the v2.33.0-rc0
regression in c49a177beca (test-lib.sh: set COLUMNS=80 for --verbose
repeatability, 2021-06-29) before the final v2.33.0.
Yeah, this is ugly but not so ugly as the original version ;-)
Thanks for prodding.
quoted
* ab/lib-subtest (2021-07-21) 10 commits
* ab/only-single-progress-at-once (2021-07-23) 8 commits
Thanks, it would be great to have both of these move soon after the
release. I think the chances of unexpected breakage here are minimal
given their nature.
Have they seen enough eyeballs already to gain support?
quoted
* ab/progress-users-adjust-counters (2021-07-23) 3 commits
...
I think that what SZEDER had to say in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210802220506.GF23408@szeder.dev/ should be
enough to clear this to proceed forward.
OK, thanks.
quoted
* ab/make-tags-cleanup (2021-07-22) 5 commits
...
    As long as we have no user of a -q flag ever, what's the point of
    forever carrying the "rm foo*" when we know it's foo.out, just
    because a future Makefile change might add foo.blah?
That is not a forward-looking thinking.  A cheap and easy way to
future-proof was suggested by a reviewer.  Why ignore repeated
suggestions?
quoted
* ab/serve-cleanup (2021-08-03) 13 commits
 - fixup! {upload,receive}-pack tests: add --advertise-refs tests
 - serve.[ch]: don't pass "struct strvec *keys" to commands
 - upload-pack.c: convert to new serve.c "startup" config cb
 - upload-pack: document and rename --advertise-refs
 - {upload,receive}-pack tests: add --advertise-refs tests
 - serve.[ch]: remove "serve_options", split up --advertise-refs code
 - serve.c: move version line to advertise_capabilities()
 - serve: add support for a "startup" git_config() callback
 - serve.c: add call_{advertise,command}() indirection
 - serve: use designated initializers
 - transport: use designated initializers
 - transport: rename "fetch" in transport_vtable to "fetch_refs"
 - serve: mark has_capability() as static

 Code clean-up around "git serve".
It seems the reception to the "config callback" part of this was rather
lukewarm. I'll re-roll to eject those changes and see if it's better
received.
I'll eject this topic and other "will reroll" topics until the
final, with the hope to restart post release, then.  Our focus ought
to be to stabilize the upcoming release and having more topics or
topics that won't be near 'next' updated adds to distraction.

Thanks.

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2021, #02; Tue, 3)

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-04 22:20:01

On Wed, Aug 04 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
* ab/make-tags-cleanup (2021-07-22) 5 commits
...
    As long as we have no user of a -q flag ever, what's the point of
    forever carrying the "rm foo*" when we know it's foo.out, just
    because a future Makefile change might add foo.blah?
That is not a forward-looking thinking.  A cheap and easy way to
future-proof was suggested by a reviewer.  Why ignore repeated
suggestions?
Raising it repeatedly is an odd way to ignore it :)

But sure, all I was looking for was some reply to
https://lore.kernel.org/git/87k0lit57x.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/; if you
want to keep it sure, I'll keep it. Will re-roll.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help