From: Junio C Hamano <hidden> Date: 2021-07-14 22:25:21
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref]
writes:
Unfortunately, this means that we no longer can rely on a shallow clone:
There is no way of knowing just how many commits the upstream branch
advanced after the commit from which the PR branch branched off. So
let's just go with a full clone instead, and be safe rather than sorry
(if we have "too shallow" a situation, a commit range `@{u}..` may very
well include a shallow commit itself, and the output of `git show
--check <shallow>` is _not_ pretty).
Makes sense.
As long as you have pull-request base, I suspect that you could
shallow clone the base and incrementally fetch the rest to update,
perhaps? But I do not know if it is worth doing so for a small
project like ours.
Thanks.
From: Taylor Blau <hidden> Date: 2021-07-14 22:29:49
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:25:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref]
writes:
quoted
Unfortunately, this means that we no longer can rely on a shallow clone:
There is no way of knowing just how many commits the upstream branch
advanced after the commit from which the PR branch branched off. So
let's just go with a full clone instead, and be safe rather than sorry
(if we have "too shallow" a situation, a commit range `@{u}..` may very
well include a shallow commit itself, and the output of `git show
--check <shallow>` is _not_ pretty).
Makes sense.
As long as you have pull-request base, I suspect that you could
shallow clone the base and incrementally fetch the rest to update,
perhaps? But I do not know if it is worth doing so for a small
project like ours.
...I wondered whether "fetch-depth: 0" was the default and whether or
not this hunk could have just removed "fetch-depth" entirely. But the
default is "1", and "0" means "fetch everything". So we really do need
it.
Thanks,
Taylor
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden> Date: 2021-07-15 12:59:23
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref]
writes:
quoted
Unfortunately, this means that we no longer can rely on a shallow clone:
There is no way of knowing just how many commits the upstream branch
advanced after the commit from which the PR branch branched off. So
let's just go with a full clone instead, and be safe rather than sorry
(if we have "too shallow" a situation, a commit range `@{u}..` may very
well include a shallow commit itself, and the output of `git show
--check <shallow>` is _not_ pretty).
Makes sense.
As long as you have pull-request base, I suspect that you could
shallow clone the base and incrementally fetch the rest to update,
perhaps?
Fetching into shallow clones is very expensive on the server. I want to
avoid that whenever possible.
But I do not know if it is worth doing so for a small project like ours.
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden> Date: 2021-07-15 13:00:17
Hi Taylor,
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Taylor Blau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:25:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref]
writes:
quoted
Unfortunately, this means that we no longer can rely on a shallow clone:
There is no way of knowing just how many commits the upstream branch
advanced after the commit from which the PR branch branched off. So
let's just go with a full clone instead, and be safe rather than sorry
(if we have "too shallow" a situation, a commit range `@{u}..` may very
well include a shallow commit itself, and the output of `git show
--check <shallow>` is _not_ pretty).
Makes sense.
As long as you have pull-request base, I suspect that you could
shallow clone the base and incrementally fetch the rest to update,
perhaps? But I do not know if it is worth doing so for a small
project like ours.
...I wondered whether "fetch-depth: 0" was the default and whether or
not this hunk could have just removed "fetch-depth" entirely. But the
default is "1", and "0" means "fetch everything". So we really do need
it.
Indeed. One of the things that makes `action/checkout@v2` so much faster
than `@v1` is that it fetches shallow by default. But we can't have that
here.
Ciao,
Dscho