Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] [GSOC][RFC] cat-file: reuse ref-filter logic

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-06-17 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] [GSOC][RFC] cat-file: reuse ref-filter logic

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-16 07:29:26

"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref] writes:
This patch series make cat-file reuse ref-filter logic, which based on
5a5b5f78 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom)
Hmph, does anybody have 5a5b5f78?

The way to deal with this and avoid resending the same patches
(assuming that this is not a 9-patch series, but only 5 of them are
new) is to rebase your topic on 723bc66d (ref-filter: add %(rest)
atom, 2021-06-09), which will allow you to discard the 4 earlier
patches, and force push, with base set to 723bc66d, I think, but I
am not a GGG user, so there may need an extra step or two on top of
that.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] [GSOC][RFC] cat-file: reuse ref-filter logic

From: ZheNing Hu <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-17 06:07:57

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] 于2021年6月16日周三 下午3:29写道:
"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
This patch series make cat-file reuse ref-filter logic, which based on
5a5b5f78 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom)
Hmph, does anybody have 5a5b5f78?

The way to deal with this and avoid resending the same patches
(assuming that this is not a 9-patch series, but only 5 of them are
new) is to rebase your topic on 723bc66d (ref-filter: add %(rest)
atom, 2021-06-09), which will allow you to discard the 4 earlier
patches, and force push, with base set to 723bc66d, I think, but I
am not a GGG user, so there may need an extra step or two on top of
that.
Oh, 5a5b5f78 is in gitgitgadget.git and 723bc66d in git.git, their commit
messages are different. Later I will rebase my new patch to zh/xxx.

Thanks.
--
ZheNing Hu
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help