Re: Why doesn't `git log -m` imply `-p`?
From: Sergey Organov <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-10 12:51:10
Alex Henrie [off-list ref] writes:
I read the following in `man git-log` today:
--diff-merges=separate, --diff-merges=m, -m
This makes merge commits show the full diff with respect to each of
the parents. Separate log entry and diff is generated for each
parent. -m doesn't produce any output without -p.
--diff-merges=combined, --diff-merges=c, -c
With this option, diff output for a merge commit shows the
differences from each of the parents to the merge result
simultaneously instead of showing pairwise diff between a parent and
the result one at a time. Furthermore, it lists only files which
were modified from all parents. -c implies -p.
--diff-merges=dense-combined, --diff-merges=cc, --cc
With this option the output produced by --diff-merges=combined is
further compressed by omitting uninteresting hunks whose contents
in the parents have only two variants and the merge result picks one
of them without modification. --cc implies -p.
Why do -c and -cc imply -p, but -m does not? I tried to use both `git
log -c` and `git log -m` today and was confused when the latter didn't
produce any output. Could we change this behavior in a future version
of Git?Patches to fix this are almost ready, but I'd like to make a warning that you'd likely be even more confused by the current output of "-m", unless you set "log.diffMerges" configuration option to "first-parent". These diffs with respect to /second/ parent at the end of the output made me really mad once upon a time. -- Sergey Organov