From: Martin Ågren <hidden> Date: 2021-05-09 09:10:39
Two small things I noticed while going through the doc-diff between
v2.31.0 and master ("The fourteenth batch").
Martin Ågren (2):
git-repack.txt: remove spurious ")"
pretty-formats.txt: add missing space
Documentation/git-repack.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/pretty-formats.txt | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd
From: Martin Ågren <hidden> Date: 2021-05-09 09:10:48
Drop the ")" at the end of this paragraph. There's a parenthetical
remark in this paragraph, but it's been closed on the line above.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <redacted>
---
Documentation/git-repack.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ When `--unpacked` is specified, loose objects are implicitly included in this "roll-up", without respect to their reachability. This is subject to change in the future. This option (implying a drastically different repack mode) is not guaranteed to work with all other combinations of-option to `git repack`).+option to `git repack`. CONFIGURATION -------------
From: Martin Ågren <hidden> Date: 2021-05-09 09:10:49
The description of "%ch" is missing a space after "human style", before
the parenthetical remark. This description was introduced in b722d4560e
("pretty: provide human date format", 2021-04-25). That commit also
added "%ah", which does have the space already.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <redacted>
---
Documentation/pretty-formats.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ The placeholders are: '%ci':: committer date, ISO 8601-like format '%cI':: committer date, strict ISO 8601 format '%cs':: committer date, short format (`YYYY-MM-DD`)-'%ch':: committer date, human style(like the `--date=human` option of+'%ch':: committer date, human style (like the `--date=human` option of linkgit:git-rev-list[1]) '%d':: ref names, like the --decorate option of linkgit:git-log[1] '%D':: ref names without the " (", ")" wrapping.
From: ZheNing Hu <hidden> Date: 2021-05-09 14:13:48
Martin Ågren [off-list ref] 于2021年5月9日周日 下午5:10写道:
quoted hunk
The description of "%ch" is missing a space after "human style", before
the parenthetical remark. This description was introduced in b722d4560e
("pretty: provide human date format", 2021-04-25). That commit also
added "%ah", which does have the space already.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <redacted>
---
Documentation/pretty-formats.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ The placeholders are: '%ci':: committer date, ISO 8601-like format '%cI':: committer date, strict ISO 8601 format '%cs':: committer date, short format (`YYYY-MM-DD`)-'%ch':: committer date, human style(like the `--date=human` option of+'%ch':: committer date, human style (like the `--date=human` option of linkgit:git-rev-list[1]) '%d':: ref names, like the --decorate option of linkgit:git-log[1] '%D':: ref names without the " (", ")" wrapping.--
From: Martin Ågren <hidden> Date: 2021-05-09 15:28:10
On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 16:13, ZheNing Hu [off-list ref] wrote:
Martin Ågren [off-list ref] 于2021年5月9日周日 下午5:10写道:
quoted
The description of "%ch" is missing a space after "human style", before
the parenthetical remark. This description was introduced in b722d4560e
("pretty: provide human date format", 2021-04-25). That commit also
added "%ah", which does have the space already.
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ The placeholders are: '%ci':: committer date, ISO 8601-like format '%cI':: committer date, strict ISO 8601 format '%cs':: committer date, short format (`YYYY-MM-DD`)-'%ch':: committer date, human style(like the `--date=human` option of+'%ch':: committer date, human style (like the `--date=human` option of linkgit:git-rev-list[1])
Ah, thanks for the pointer. It looks like this was merged to "next" in
2320ad8fb0 ("Merge branch 'zh/pretty-date-human' into next", 2021-04-30), so a
few days before you sent v4.
Junio probably missed v4 entirely, or he might have responded with something
like "v3 is already in next, so please build incrementally on top of it".
Thanks for contributing this functionality. I quite like the "human" format.
Martin