Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] userdiff: refactor + test improvements

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-03-24 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] userdiff: refactor + test improvements

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-24 19:03:54

Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:
Am 24.03.21 um 02:48 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
quoted
This is a restart of the 35-patch v3 of this topic at
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210224195129.4004-1-avarab@gmail.com/

I still plan on submitting the rest of it, but wanted to start with
the early parts of that series that hasn't been controversial or has
outstanding feedback I haven't addressed.

The range-diff to v3 is just for those patches I'm re-rolling here.
I'm mostly relying on the interdiff below. I think I had no comments on
these patches in the earlier round, so:

Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <redacted>
Thanks.  I've read through everything in the patch this round,
ignoring anything that came before, and them looked mostly fine.
Peff's comment on 01/10 to make it if/else if cascade does make
sense to me, too, though.

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] userdiff: refactor + test improvements

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-24 19:15:53

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:02:54PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Am 24.03.21 um 02:48 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
quoted
This is a restart of the 35-patch v3 of this topic at
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210224195129.4004-1-avarab@gmail.com/

I still plan on submitting the rest of it, but wanted to start with
the early parts of that series that hasn't been controversial or has
outstanding feedback I haven't addressed.

The range-diff to v3 is just for those patches I'm re-rolling here.
I'm mostly relying on the interdiff below. I think I had no comments on
these patches in the earlier round, so:

Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <redacted>
Thanks.  I've read through everything in the patch this round,
ignoring anything that came before, and them looked mostly fine.
Peff's comment on 01/10 to make it if/else if cascade does make
sense to me, too, though.
I left some other comments on patch 4, mostly about clarity. But just to
be clear, I don't think there's anything incorrect there, and I wouldn't
be offended if it gets picked up as-is.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help