Re: [PATCH] mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default

2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-03-12 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-12 23:13:10

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
As we want to disable the feature for any backend when the user does
not explicitly say the feature is wanted (either in general, or for
a specific backend), the change in the above hunk is exactly want we
want to see.

Looking good.  Let's not revert the series and disable by default.

Should I expect an updated log message, though?  What was in the
proposed log message sounded more unsubstantiated complaint than
giving readable reasons why the feature is unwanted, but both the
response by Seth and your response to Seth's response had material
that made it more convincing why we would want to disable this by
default, e.g. "with little to no explanation", "We don't have a way
to communicate to the end-user" (both by Seth), "when ... didn't end
up lining up the files correctly", "no way to visually distinguish"
(yours) are all good ingredients to explain why this feature is
prone to subtly and silently give wrong information to the
end-users.
For tonight's pushout, I'll use the patch as-is and merge it in
'seen'.
Any progress here?

Re: [PATCH] mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default

From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-12 23:30:46

Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
As we want to disable the feature for any backend when the user does
not explicitly say the feature is wanted (either in general, or for
a specific backend), the change in the above hunk is exactly want we
want to see.

Looking good.  Let's not revert the series and disable by default.

Should I expect an updated log message, though?
[...]
quoted
For tonight's pushout, I'll use the patch as-is and merge it in
'seen'.
Any progress here?
Sorry for the delay.  I should be able to send out an improved log
message (more concise and summarizing the supporting info from this
thread) later this afternoon.

Thanks,
Jonathan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help