Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ls-files.c: add --deduplicate option
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-20 21:38:25
"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
@@ -321,30 +324,46 @@ static void show_files(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir) construct_fullname(&fullname, repo, ce); + if (skipping_duplicates && last_shown_ce && + !strcmp(last_shown_ce->name,ce->name)) + continue;
Style. Missing SP after comma.
if ((dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED) &&
!ce_excluded(dir, repo->index, fullname.buf, ce))
continue;
if (ce->ce_flags & CE_UPDATE)
continue;
if (show_cached || show_stage) {
+ if (skipping_duplicates && last_shown_ce &&
+ !strcmp(last_shown_ce->name,ce->name))
+ continue;OK. When show_stage is set, skipping_duplicates is automatically turned off (and show_unmerged is automatically covered as it turns show_stage on automatically). So this feature has really become "are we showing only names, and if so, did we show an entry of the same name before?".
if (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce)) show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, ce_stage(ce) ? tag_unmerged : (ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? tag_skip_worktree : tag_cached)); + if (show_cached && skipping_duplicates) + last_shown_ce = ce;
The code that calls show_ce() belonging to a totally separate if()
statement makes my stomach hurt---how are we going to guarantee that
"last shown" really will keep track of what was shown last?
Shouldn't the above be more like this?
- if (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce))
+ if (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce)) {
show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf,
ce_stage(ce) ? tag_unmerged :
(ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? tag_skip_worktree :
tag_cached));
+ last_shown_ce = ce;
+ }
It does maintain last_shown_ce even when skipping_duplicates is not
set, but I think that is overall win. Assigning unconditionally
would be cheaper than making a conditional jump on the variable and
make assignment (or not).
} if (ce_skip_worktree(ce)) continue; + if (skipping_duplicates && last_shown_ce && + !strcmp(last_shown_ce->name,ce->name)) + continue;
Style. Missing SP after comma. OK, if we've shown an entry of the same name under skip-duplicates mode, and the code that follows will show the same entry (if they decide to show it), so we can go to the next entry early.
err = lstat(fullname.buf, &st);
if (err) {
- if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR)
- error_errno("cannot lstat '%s'", fullname.buf);
- if (show_deleted)
+ if (skipping_duplicates && show_deleted && show_modified)
show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_removed);
- if (show_modified)
- show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_modified);
+ else {
+ if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR)
+ error_errno("cannot lstat '%s'", fullname.buf);
+ if (show_deleted)
+ show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_removed);
+ if (show_modified)
+ show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_modified);
+ }
} else if (show_modified && ie_modified(repo->index, ce, &st, 0))
show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_modified);This part will change shape quite a bit when we follow the suggestion I made on 1/3, so I won't analyze how correct this version is.
quoted hunk
+ last_shown_ce = ce; } strbuf_release(&fullname);@@ -571,6 +590,7 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) N_("pretend that paths removed since <tree-ish> are still present")), OPT__ABBREV(&abbrev), OPT_BOOL(0, "debug", &debug_mode, N_("show debugging data")), + OPT_BOOL(0,"deduplicate",&skipping_duplicates,N_("suppress duplicate entries")), OPT_END() };@@ -610,6 +630,8 @@ int cmd_ls_files(int argc, const char **argv, const char *cmd_prefix) * you also show the stage information. */ show_stage = 1; + if (show_tag || show_stage) + skipping_duplicates = 0;
OK.
if (dir.exclude_per_dir) exc_given = 1;
Thanks.