Re: [PATCH] CoC: update to version 2.0 + local changes

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Here is to remind those of you who may want to add your Acked-by to
Ævar's proposed update to show your support.  I've collected ones on
the list I saw in replies to the original proposal [*1*] but in case
I missed yours...

Thanks.
...
[Reference]

*1* Message-Id: [off-list ref]

----- >8 ---------- >8 ---------- >8 ---------- >8 ---------- >8 -----
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted>
Subject: [PATCH] CoC: update to version 2.0 + local changes

Update the CoC added in 5cdf2301 (add a Code of Conduct document,
2019-09-24 from version 1.4 to version 2.0. This is the version found
at [1] with the following minor changes:

 - We preserve the change to the CoC in 3f9ef874a73 (CODE_OF_CONDUCT:
   mention individual project-leader emails, 2019-09-26)

 - We preserve the custom intro added in 5cdf2301d4a (add a Code of
   Conduct document, 2019-09-24)

This change intentionally preserves a warning emitted on "git diff
--check". It's better to make it easily diff-able with upstream than
to fix whitespace changes in our version while we're at it.

1. https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct/code_of_conduct.md

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <redacted>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <redacted>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <redacted>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <redacted>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
---

I guess I should lead by an example ;-)  The above misses mine and
Signed-off-by means a totally different thing [*1*] from Acked-by.

    Acked-by: Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]


[Footnote]

*1* Most importantly, signing off is about recording provenance of
    the change. You certify that you have enough rights to pass the
    patch along to the project, and you agree that the fact that you
    contributed the patch will be recorded in perpetuity.  It does
    not mean that you agree to the change in the patch and you do
    not assure correctness of the patch by signing it off.  I signed
    off the above patch to say I got it from Ævar and committing it
    as-is, but it does not say that I agree with the move of our CoC
    to Contributor Covenant 2.0, hence my Ack here.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:05:09AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <redacted>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <redacted>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <redacted>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <redacted>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
---

I guess I should lead by an example ;-)  The above misses mine and
Signed-off-by means a totally different thing [*1*] from Acked-by.

    Acked-by: Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]

I thought your "From" would be enough, but I see this re-wrapped version
if "From: Ævar" (so I guess my same argument applies for him ;) ).

Thanks for reposting this; I was trying hard not to look at my email
during the week of the original thread.

I agree with the sentiment expressed earlier that the "consequences" are
a little funny for us, since our decentralized infrastructure makes
things like banning a bit confusing. But that was already present to
some degree in the older version, and I do like the notion that we'd
stick to the original as closely as possible. So:

  Acked-by: Jeff King [off-list ref]

-Peff