Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2021, #02; Fri, 8)

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

* ab/trailers-extra-format (2020-12-09) 5 commits
 ...

 The "--format=%(trailers)" mechanism gets enhanced to make it
 easier to design output for machine consumption.

Thanks! Am refactoring some out-of-tree code to take advantage of this
:)

Thank you for interesting additions.

I forgot that, oops. Is just declaring here that all of that's:

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted>

Since you have some acks etc. squashed into it at this point...

Puzzlled.  The patches on the trailers topic were all signed-off by
you, unless I was careless when I checked before merging them to
'next'.

Do the above three lines refer to a different topic, on CoC 2.0?

quoted

* bc/hashed-mailmap (2020-12-12) 1 commit
 - mailmap: support hashed entries in mailmaps

 The mailmap database learned to take hashed value as the original
 side of mapping.

 Expecting a reroll.

FWIW there was since a re-roll on 2021-01-03, but the discussion is
sort-of outstanding, so maybe that's intentional...

I had an impression that those 4 or 5 patches haven't gained
concensus that they are good as-is.

Thanks.

On 2021-01-09 at 21:28:58, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

FWIW there was since a re-roll on 2021-01-03, but the discussion is
sort-of outstanding, so maybe that's intentional...

I had an impression that those 4 or 5 patches haven't gained
concensus that they are good as-is.

There will be another reroll.  I'm hoping to get to it this weekend.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Houston, Texas, US

On Sat, Jan 09 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I forgot that, oops. Is just declaring here that all of that's:

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted>

Since you have some acks etc. squashed into it at this point...

Puzzlled.  The patches on the trailers topic were all signed-off by
you, unless I was careless when I checked before merging them to
'next'.

Do the above three lines refer to a different topic, on CoC 2.0?

Yes, I accidentally snipped out the part I should have been quoting. I
meant "please assume my signed-off-by" to be in reply the CoC 2.0
series.