Emily Shaffer [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
By the way, es/config-hooks does not seem to pass 5411 (at least)
even as a standalone topic, and has been kicked out of 'seen' for
some time. Has anybody took a look into the issue?
Yeah, I looked at it today. Looks like an issue with not paying
attention to master->main default config, since I added a new test to
the 5411 suite (which means it wouldn't have made a conflict for someone
to say "ah yes, s/master/main/g"). I am tracking down couple of other CI
errors today and will send a reroll today or tomorrow.
Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:32:46PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Emily Shaffer [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
By the way, es/config-hooks does not seem to pass 5411 (at least)
even as a standalone topic, and has been kicked out of 'seen' for
some time. Has anybody took a look into the issue?
Yeah, I looked at it today. Looks like an issue with not paying
attention to master->main default config, since I added a new test to
the 5411 suite (which means it wouldn't have made a conflict for someone
to say "ah yes, s/master/main/g"). I am tracking down couple of other CI
errors today and will send a reroll today or tomorrow.
Thanks.
I don't have a reroll today. I have been trying to get to the bottom of
a test which fails when built with clang but passes when built with gcc
(t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh after patch 12 of the part II series) and
have not made progress on that, let alone on the other tasks I wanted to
do before sending the next version.
Next week I will only work one day, so I'd anticipate a reroll sometime
the week following. Sorry for the wait - but I think even if I sent it
with the fix for this t5411 failure, it would still break 'seen' because
of whatever this clang vs. gcc problem is.
Hope you enjoy your holidays.
- Emily