RE: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.22.0-rc3
From: Randall S. Becker <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-06 20:04:44
On Monday, June 3, 2019 10:14 AM, I wrote:
On Monday, June 3, 2019 9:50 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:quoted
To: Randall S. Becker <redacted> Cc: 'Junio C Hamano' <redacted>; git@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.22.0-rc2 Hi Randall, On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, Randall S. Becker wrote:quoted
Just a few small nits from RC2 test results on the NonStop TNS/E platform: 1. t0021 subtest 15 is being flakey. It fails on the first run (make -k test) but succeeds when run in isolation. This is new on the NonStop TNS/E platform. t0021 has been a bit flakey in the past, but not recently. Just thought I'd mention it. It's only slightly disconcerting because I make very heavy use of smudge filters but since it runs fine in isolation, I'm going to assume it is fine. We had one unsubstantiated report of an occasional misfire of smudge filters, but no substantive evidence at this point to reproduce thesituation.quoted
t0021.15 is indeed flaky, and not only for NonStop. It is so flaky, even,that Iquoted
opened https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/241Thanks.quoted
quoted
2. t7519 subtest 25 still does not pass (previously reported for RC1) when run via "make -k test" the first time. This runs successfully when run in isolation or the second time.I offered a fix for that in js/fsmonitor-unflake, and it already made itintoquoted
`next` (and hopefully into v2.22.0) as you can see here: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/commit/b5a81697520 (look for the branch symbol below the commit message).I'll keep an eye out for it. We are good with RC2 anyway.quoted
quoted
3. t9001, t9020, t9600, t9601, t9602, t9604, fail, but should not run on platform (not new, just a reminder). We do not have sendmail or subversion.At least for Subversion, this should be detected. For send-email, I don't know... There *was* a bug in t9001 where it failed to mark a send-email tests cases with the `PERL` prerequisite, but that was fixed, and I guessyouquoted
have Perl anyway?Yes, we do have Perl on the box. However, the send-email functions do not work - probably missing modules. As far as SVN goes, we have the git SVN modules, but not the actual SVM modules in our Perl. There has been some effort to port those, but we have had CPAN issues for a while now. I am trying to find a resource to help with porting - personally, I could
really use
the SVN module to allow svn2git to function on box. That would make my life a whole lot easier.
RC3 shows no new breaks on NonStop. We are good with approving this one. Kind Regards, Randall