did we ever resolve what "known to Git" should mean?
From: Robert P. J. Day <hidden>
Date: 2019-03-06 14:44:50
going back to a couple threads: https://marc.info/?l=git&m=151048015116473&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152690160605723&w=2 and i'm going to try to clarify what (if anything) was decided regarding the internally inconsistent phrase "known to Git." junio's take on this here: https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152695527902711&w=2 was to banish the phrase entirely in favour of some combination of "tracked" and/or "added to the index." thoughts? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================