Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 6:05 PM Thomas Rast via GitGitGadget
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
These are essentially lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff, with
light touch-ups to account for the command now being names `git
s/names/named/
Thanks.
I already pushed an update to https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1.
Should I take "pushed to ... GGG" to mean "do not merge what you
have to 'next' yet, as there will be an updated series (not
incremental) being prepared"?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:18 PM Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I already pushed an update to https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1.
Should I take "pushed to ... GGG" to mean "do not merge what you
have to 'next' yet, as there will be an updated series (not
incremental) being prepared"?
Not speaking for Johannes, but I think that *could* work.
On the other hand full rerolls are more expensive to prep
(at least for me, I guess GGG might change that)
git range-diff gitgitgadget/pr/1...origin/js/range-diff
shows there is
* a different header guard:
@@ -418,8 +419,8 @@
--- /dev/null
+++ b/range-diff.h
@@
-+#ifndef RANGE_DIFF_H
-+#define RANGE_DIFF_H
++#ifndef BRANCH_DIFF_H
++#define BRANCH_DIFF_H
+
* another different header guard:
@@ -239,8 +240,8 @@
--- /dev/null
+++ b/linear-assignment.h
@@
-+#ifndef LINEAR_ASSIGNMENT_H
-+#define LINEAR_ASSIGNMENT_H
++#ifndef HUNGARIAN_H
++#define HUNGARIAN_H
+
although this one is the other way round. Did you
squash in one header guard and Johannes fixed a
header guard in a different file?
With that said, I can send my series for more color testing
and better diff.c code on top of either.
(https://public-inbox.org/git/20180728030448.192177-1-sbeller@google.com/)
Stefan