Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2017, #05; Wed, 27)

Elijah Newren [off-list ref] writes:

surprised by the branch name, though.  Was 'ew/' a typo,

Blush X-<.  Yes it is a typo.

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

Elijah Newren [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

surprised by the branch name, though.  Was 'ew/' a typo,

Blush X-<.  Yes it is a typo.

Note on that series:
I have reviewed the first three patches (which could form an independent series)
that it would warrant a Reviewed-By: Stefan Beller [off-list ref]

While I reviewed the earlier versions of the later patches, I would
prefer if there is another reviewer for these as it seems like a bigger
contribution at a core functionality.

I cc'd some people who were active in some form of rename detection
work earlier; could you review this series, please?

Thanks,
Stefan

Stefan Beller wrote:

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Elijah Newren [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

surprised by the branch name, though.  Was 'ew/' a typo,

Blush X-<.  Yes it is a typo.

Note on that series:
I have reviewed the first three patches (which could form an independent series)
that it would warrant a Reviewed-By: Stefan Beller [off-list ref]

While I reviewed the earlier versions of the later patches, I would
prefer if there is another reviewer for these as it seems like a bigger
contribution at a core functionality.

I cc'd some people who were active in some form of rename detection
work earlier; could you review this series, please?

I'm missing context about which series you mean (though I think I can
guess).  Do you mind resending this request-for-review in a reply to
the patch thread?

That way, the request would be in context where my mail reader can
bring up the thread and it's easy for others to see that the request
happened, all in one place.

Thanks,
Jonathan