Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-stash.txt: correct "git stash" behavior with no arguments

2 messages, 1 author, 2017-10-12 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-stash.txt: correct "git stash" behavior with no arguments

From: 小川恭史 <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-12 03:52:42

As you point,

    git stash

without any argument is equivalent to both of

    git stash save
    git stash push

. The original sentence is correct.

2017-10-12 12:31 GMT+09:00 小川恭史 [off-list ref]:
As you point,

    git stash

without any argument is equivalent to both of
git stash save and


2017-10-12 9:53 GMT+09:00 Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]:
quoted
Takahito Ogawa [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ and reverts the working directory to match the `HEAD`
commit.
 The modifications stashed away by this command can be listed with
 `git stash list`, inspected with `git stash show`, and restored
 (potentially on top of a different commit) with `git stash apply`.
-Calling `git stash` without any arguments is equivalent to `git stash
save`.
+Calling `git stash` without any arguments is equivalent to `git stash
push`.
Hmph.  Is there any difference between

        git stash save
        git stash push

without any other argument?  Aren't they equivalent to

        git stash

without any argument, which is what this sentence explains?

Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-stash.txt: correct "git stash" behavior with no arguments

From: 小川恭史 <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-12 03:54:37

As you point,

    git stash

without any argument is equivalent to both of

    git stash save
    git stash push

. The original sentence is correct.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help