@@ -35,13 +35,7 @@ typedef void *SSL;#include"http.h"#endif-#if defined(USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND) && defined(NO_OPENSSL)-/* only available option */#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 1-#else-/* strictly opt in */-#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 0-#endifstaticintverbosity;staticintuse_curl=USE_CURL_DEFAULT;
So this is now basically "static int use_curl = 1;".
Do we need a compile-time escape-hatch in case someone really needs
to avoid curl, e.g., because they have a too old version? I suppose
there is a conceptual difference between the "default", i.e., the value
of USE_CURL_DEFAULT that is assigned to "use_curl", and the "default
default", i.e., the value that is normally assigned to USE_CURL_DEFAULT.
Martin
@@ -35,13 +35,7 @@ typedef void *SSL;#include"http.h"#endif-#if defined(USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND) && defined(NO_OPENSSL)-/* only available option */#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 1-#else-/* strictly opt in */-#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 0-#endifstaticintverbosity;staticintuse_curl=USE_CURL_DEFAULT;
So this is now basically "static int use_curl = 1;".
Do we need a compile-time escape-hatch in case someone really needs
to avoid curl, e.g., because they have a too old version? I suppose
there is a conceptual difference between the "default", i.e., the value
of USE_CURL_DEFAULT that is assigned to "use_curl", and the "default
default", i.e., the value that is normally assigned to USE_CURL_DEFAULT.
Martin
The curl code depends on USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND so even with use_curl == 1, it won't be an issue for people without curl (or old one).
I wasn't sure whether to drop the define or not and figure it might be worth keeping in case in change in the future for some reason.
I don't mind dropping it and hardcofing the default to 1
Also on a side note, I have a case where authentication works with --no-curl but fails withs --curl. Still trying to figure out why.
Nicolas
@@ -35,13 +35,7 @@ typedef void *SSL;#include"http.h"#endif-#if defined(USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND) && defined(NO_OPENSSL)-/* only available option */#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 1-#else-/* strictly opt in */-#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 0-#endifstaticintverbosity;staticintuse_curl=USE_CURL_DEFAULT;
So this is now basically "static int use_curl = 1;".
Do we need a compile-time escape-hatch in case someone really needs
to avoid curl, e.g., because they have a too old version? I suppose
there is a conceptual difference between the "default", i.e., the value
of USE_CURL_DEFAULT that is assigned to "use_curl", and the "default
default", i.e., the value that is normally assigned to USE_CURL_DEFAULT.
Martin
The curl code depends on USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND so even with use_curl == 1, it won't be an issue for people without curl (or old one).
I have just looked at the sources and haven't thought too hard about it,
but doesn't it mean that compiling without USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND
results in a binary such that you must use --no-curl or get used to seeing
"warning: --curl not supported in this build"?
I wasn't sure whether to drop the define or not and figure it might be worth keeping in case in change in the future for some reason.
I don't mind dropping it and hardcofing the default to 1
I did not intend to suggest that. Just to be clear, I am very unfamiliar
with most of the Git codebase. Please don't take anything I say as
advice. :) As a question about something you have or haven't already
thought about, sure. :)
Martin
From: Jeff King <hidden> Date: 2017-08-07 20:01:37
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:04:05PM +0200, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <redacted>
Thanks for moving forward with this.
Can you please flesh out your commit messages with some of the reasoning
and related discussion? I know from a nearby thread why we want to flip
the default, but people reading `git log` much later will not have that
context.
@@ -35,13 +35,7 @@ typedef void *SSL;#include"http.h"#endif-#if defined(USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND) && defined(NO_OPENSSL)-/* only available option */#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 1-#else-/* strictly opt in */-#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 0-#endif
I agree with the comments Martin made here. I think there are really two
levels of "default" we need to care about:
1. Build-time: do we default to requiring curl if you want imap-send
at all?
2. Run-time: if build with both implementations, which do we use by
default? Related, if there is only one implementation, what should
the default be?
I think the answer to (1) is that we still want to build imap-send
without USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND if the user doesn't have curl installed.
And your patch leaves that, which is good. Though if we are deprecating
it, we may want to issue a deprecation warning (eventually; we can still
switch the run-time default now, get more data on whether a
deprecation/switch is a good idea, and then later decide to deprecate).
For (2), you're trying to switch the default when both are built. But I
think it's important to continue to default to the old-style
implementation if that's the only thing that was built. Otherwise it
effectively becomes the build-time deprecation warning, and we're not
quite ready for that.
So I think this maybe needs to be:
#if defined(USE_CURL_FOR_IMAP_SEND)
/* Always default to curl if it's available. */
#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 1
#else
/* We don't have curl, so continue to use the historical implementation */
#define USE_CURL_DEFAULT 0
#endif
-Peff