I'm wondering if anybody has opinions on:
https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/924
(and I suspect most people in this community do not read pull requests
there, hence this post).
Basically, we maintain a list of links to outside documentation, as well
as to books. Somebody has requested a link to their paid tutorial
course. How should we handle it?
If the resource is valuable, then it may make sense to link to it, even
if it costs money. We already do this with book links, and my policy has
been to link any relevant book that is requested (I don't read them for
quality, so I have no opinions).
Should we do the same for tutorial content like this?
-Peff
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
I'm wondering if anybody has opinions on:
https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/924
(and I suspect most people in this community do not read pull requests
there, hence this post).
Yeah, thanks for posting it here.
Basically, we maintain a list of links to outside documentation, as well
as to books. Somebody has requested a link to their paid tutorial
course. How should we handle it?
I think it depends if you are ready and willing to handle more changes.
If the resource is valuable, then it may make sense to link to it, even
if it costs money. We already do this with book links, and my policy has
been to link any relevant book that is requested (I don't read them for
quality, so I have no opinions).
Should we do the same for tutorial content like this?
It could make sense to link to tutorial content, and then it could
also make sense to link to trainings (online and maybe offline too),
but my fear is that you could then have many people who want to
advertise their tutorials and trainings, and that it might be
difficult to draw a line while keeping the playing field even.
But maybe it's worth trying anyway.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 08:13:53PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
quoted
Basically, we maintain a list of links to outside documentation, as well
as to books. Somebody has requested a link to their paid tutorial
course. How should we handle it?
I think it depends if you are ready and willing to handle more changes.
I don't clicking "merge" on more changes if people are willing to do the
design work.
quoted
Should we do the same for tutorial content like this?
It could make sense to link to tutorial content, and then it could
also make sense to link to trainings (online and maybe offline too),
but my fear is that you could then have many people who want to
advertise their tutorials and trainings, and that it might be
difficult to draw a line while keeping the playing field even.
But maybe it's worth trying anyway.
I think I'm inclined to try it, as long as it's kept in a separate "paid
training" section, and is open to everybody. If it becomes a burden, we
can cut it out later. I think the important thing is that it be equally
open to everybody or nobody, but not just "some". So we'll go with
everybody for now, and switch to nobody later if need be.
-Peff